2008
DOI: 10.1080/09649060802469835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The right to reside and access to social security in the Courts of Appeal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A reason for this softer trait could be the less harsh imposition of conditionality and sanctions. While scheme participants face potential sanctions if refusing a referral to a scheme without a plausible reason (Department of Social Protection, 2018), sanctions in the Irish welfare system are considered light compared to other liberal regimes, such as the UK (Cousins, 2019). Additionally, the Community Employment (CE) scheme advertises vacancies and permits a limited quota of eligible welfare recipients to apply, allowing a margin for choice.…”
Section: Activation In Irelandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A reason for this softer trait could be the less harsh imposition of conditionality and sanctions. While scheme participants face potential sanctions if refusing a referral to a scheme without a plausible reason (Department of Social Protection, 2018), sanctions in the Irish welfare system are considered light compared to other liberal regimes, such as the UK (Cousins, 2019). Additionally, the Community Employment (CE) scheme advertises vacancies and permits a limited quota of eligible welfare recipients to apply, allowing a margin for choice.…”
Section: Activation In Irelandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A series of rate cuts to all unemployment payments were announced in the 2009 and 2010 budgets. The headline rate of Jobseekers Allowance and Jobseekers Benefit was reduced from €204 to €188 per week (Collins and Murphy, 2016) while the payments of younger jobseekers were cut to just €100 per week for those aged 21 or under (excluding those with dependent children) and to €150 per week for those aged between 22 and 25 years of age (Cousins, 2019). This was justified on the grounds of the relative generosity of welfare in Ireland and a repeating narrative that Ireland 'lived beyond its means' (Dukelow and Considine, 2014b: 421).…”
Section: Austerity and Activationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reflecting different 'dynamics of deservingness' (Dukelow, 2021: 56) in Irish social policy, they have been targeted through a series of changes to the eligibility conditions for the One Parent Family Payment which, at the time of the crisis, was payable up until a person's youngest child reached 18 years of age (or 22 if they were in third-level education). Reform of the payment had been on the DSP's agenda since 2006, although there was little political appetite for progressing a reform that was expected to meet with strong opposition from the social partners (Cousins, 2019). This changed following the crisis, as the age at which a lone parent lost entitlement was progressively reduced.…”
Section: Widening Conditionalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, several features differentiated it from its neighbour and liberal regimes more broadly. During the early 2000s, headline benefit rates were far higher than in the UK (Dukelow and Considine, 2014b), there was minimal use of sanctions (Cousins, 2019), and -most unusually for a liberal regime -there was 'a very high level of welfare state legitimacy' (Payne and Mccashin, 2005: 3) in terms of public support for welfare expenditure. This is not to say that Ireland's pre-crisis welfare state included no demanding elements whatsoever.…”
Section: Two Welfare Reform In Post-crisis Irelandmentioning
confidence: 99%