2022
DOI: 10.12775/aph.2022.125.06
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ‘Righteous’ as an Element of Transnational Memory Politics: The Stockholm International Forum on the Holocaust and the Memory of the Rescue of Jews during the Second World War

Abstract: In the last two decades, the topic of help given to Jews during the Second World War has experienced an extraordinary boom in Europe and beyond. Transnational and intergovernmental organisations such as the Council of Europe, the European Parliament and the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) have played an essential role in promoting this subject. This paper shows that the first big event to introduce the category of the Righteous into transnational memory politics was the Stockholm Internatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Transnational or inter-governmental organizations and international networks, such as the Council of Europe, UNESCO, the International Council of Museums (ICOM) or the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA), influence national memory cultures by promoting selected topics and forms of commemoration, and also by setting heritage protection or exhibition standards. However, while on a declarative level, local memory agents try to comply with transnational memory policies, at the same time they often pursue their particularistic agendas (Kroh, 2006; Wóycicka, 2022). This is also true for legal norms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transnational or inter-governmental organizations and international networks, such as the Council of Europe, UNESCO, the International Council of Museums (ICOM) or the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA), influence national memory cultures by promoting selected topics and forms of commemoration, and also by setting heritage protection or exhibition standards. However, while on a declarative level, local memory agents try to comply with transnational memory policies, at the same time they often pursue their particularistic agendas (Kroh, 2006; Wóycicka, 2022). This is also true for legal norms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%