“…Fortunately the appearance of large, annotated and online available fine art collections such as the WikiArt 1 dataset, which contains more than 130k artwork images, enabled the adoption of deep learning techniques, as well as helped shaping a more uniform framework for method comparison. To the best of our knowledge, the WikiArt dataset is currently the most commonly used dataset for art-related classifications tasks (Karayev et al, 2014;Bar et al, 2014;David & Netanyahu, 2016;Girshick et al, 2014;Hentschel et al, 2016;Seguin et al, 2016;Chu & Wu, 2016;, even though other online available sources are also being used such as the Web Gallery of Art 2 (WGA) with more than 40k images (Seguin et al, 2016); or the Rijksmuseum challenge dataset (van Noord et al, 2015;Mensink & Van Gemert, 2014). Furthermore, there were several initiatives for building painting datasets dedicated primarily to fine art image classification such as Painting-91 (Khan et al, 2014), which consists of 4266 images from 91 different painters; the Pandora dataset consisting of 7724 images from 12 art movements (Florea et al, 2016) and the recently introduced museum-centric OmniART dataset with more than 1M photographic reproductions of artworks (Strezoski & Worring, 2017).…”