Proceedings of International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval 2014
DOI: 10.1145/2578726.2578791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Rijksmuseum Challenge

Abstract: This paper offers a challenge for visual classification and content-based retrieval of artistic content. The challenge is posed from a museum-centric point of view offering a wide range of object types including paintings, photographs, ceramics, furniture, etc. The freely available dataset consists of 112,039 photographic reproductions of the artworks exhibited in the Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. We offer four automatic visual recognition challenges consisting of predicting the artist, type, mate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fortunately the appearance of large, annotated and online available fine art collections such as the WikiArt 1 dataset, which contains more than 130k artwork images, enabled the adoption of deep learning techniques, as well as helped shaping a more uniform framework for method comparison. To the best of our knowledge, the WikiArt dataset is currently the most commonly used dataset for art-related classifications tasks (Karayev et al, 2014;Bar et al, 2014;David & Netanyahu, 2016;Girshick et al, 2014;Hentschel et al, 2016;Seguin et al, 2016;Chu & Wu, 2016;, even though other online available sources are also being used such as the Web Gallery of Art 2 (WGA) with more than 40k images (Seguin et al, 2016); or the Rijksmuseum challenge dataset (van Noord et al, 2015;Mensink & Van Gemert, 2014). Furthermore, there were several initiatives for building painting datasets dedicated primarily to fine art image classification such as Painting-91 (Khan et al, 2014), which consists of 4266 images from 91 different painters; the Pandora dataset consisting of 7724 images from 12 art movements (Florea et al, 2016) and the recently introduced museum-centric OmniART dataset with more than 1M photographic reproductions of artworks (Strezoski & Worring, 2017).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately the appearance of large, annotated and online available fine art collections such as the WikiArt 1 dataset, which contains more than 130k artwork images, enabled the adoption of deep learning techniques, as well as helped shaping a more uniform framework for method comparison. To the best of our knowledge, the WikiArt dataset is currently the most commonly used dataset for art-related classifications tasks (Karayev et al, 2014;Bar et al, 2014;David & Netanyahu, 2016;Girshick et al, 2014;Hentschel et al, 2016;Seguin et al, 2016;Chu & Wu, 2016;, even though other online available sources are also being used such as the Web Gallery of Art 2 (WGA) with more than 40k images (Seguin et al, 2016); or the Rijksmuseum challenge dataset (van Noord et al, 2015;Mensink & Van Gemert, 2014). Furthermore, there were several initiatives for building painting datasets dedicated primarily to fine art image classification such as Painting-91 (Khan et al, 2014), which consists of 4266 images from 91 different painters; the Pandora dataset consisting of 7724 images from 12 art movements (Florea et al, 2016) and the recently introduced museum-centric OmniART dataset with more than 1M photographic reproductions of artworks (Strezoski & Worring, 2017).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that the migration of patterns in paintings is mainly important in the Modern Period (1400-1800) is an important factor in choosing our base [12,13] for object classification. -RKD Challenge [25]: coming from the Rijksmuseum, this benchmark was created for scientists to test their algorithms on artists identification, labelling of materials and estimating the creation year. Boasting 112k elements, only 3'600 are actual paintings.…”
Section: Choice Of the Base Corpusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• KNN (K-Nearest Neighbors) [6,19,21,22,30]: this is a statistical method for predicting new input by calculating the similarity between the test data and the new instance by locating the closest data points (or data objects) in the training dataset based on certain distance functions. K denotes the number of closest data points (i.e., neighbors).…”
Section: Algorithms Of ML For Chmentioning
confidence: 99%