1999
DOI: 10.1093/tcbh/10.2.137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Rise and Fall of Radical Reconstruction in 1940s Britain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Those communities needed to be urgently rebuilt as a result of ‘blight and blitz’ (Hasegawa, 1999: 140–1). The residue of too many slums was still disfiguring too many cities, and parts of the country had been devastated by bombs.…”
Section: Town and Country Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those communities needed to be urgently rebuilt as a result of ‘blight and blitz’ (Hasegawa, 1999: 140–1). The residue of too many slums was still disfiguring too many cities, and parts of the country had been devastated by bombs.…”
Section: Town and Country Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samuely's review of the Greater London Plan, which argued that 'a more radical policy would have been welcome ' (1945, 324) authorities for the acquisition of land, were perceived as unsatisfactory (Hasegawa, 1992, 5-6;Hasegawa, 1999). As Tichelar described, the 1944 Act in particular was considered by many local authorities as a 'great betrayal' and a 'triumph of the rights of property' (Cited in Essex and Brayshay, 2008, 444).…”
Section: Insert Fig 7 Here (Greater London Open Spaces Plan)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Junichi hasegawa's work focuses upon the radical and utopian nature of the reconstruction plans, highlighting their possibilities for engendering greater social equity in what was a highly class-riven society and the broader political and economic contexts that facilitated their compilation. 23 on the other hand, nick tiratsoo suggests that most planners involved in the reconstruction plans of this period were, at best, mild reformers, with tightly constricted powers to enact radical modernist designs or socialist schemes, merely one set of actors locked in a complex political mesh. 24 Many had been educated in the early decades of the twentieth century, when the pervasive Garden city mentality, with its paternalistic style of population management, still carried considerable weight in the profession.…”
Section: The Post-war Reconstruction Plans As a Genrementioning
confidence: 99%