2019 IEEE/ACM 16th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/msr.2019.00071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Rise of Android Code Smells: Who is to Blame?

Abstract: The rise of mobile apps as new software systems led to the emergence of new development requirements regarding performance. Development practices that do not respect these requirements can seriously hinder app performances and impair user experience, they qualify as code smells. Mobile code smells are generally associated with inexperienced developers who lack knowledge about the framework guidelines. However, this assumption remains unverified and there is no evidence about the role played by developers in th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Awareness of code smells. Previous studies suggested that the accrual of mobile code smells and the indifference of developers toward it are signs of unawareness [15,17]. However, the inputs collected from developers in RQ 4 challenge this hypothesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Awareness of code smells. Previous studies suggested that the accrual of mobile code smells and the indifference of developers toward it are signs of unawareness [15,17]. However, the inputs collected from developers in RQ 4 challenge this hypothesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…To perform this study, we relied on the artifacts that we built in our previous works about mobile code smells. In particular, we leveraged the dataset of code smell history [15,17] to collect the necessary data for this study. Then, we followed different approaches to analyse this data and answer our research questions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations