The rise of “diminished multilateralism”: East Asian and European forum shopping in global governance

Rüland, Jürgen

doi:10.1007/s10308-012-0311-9

Cited by 24 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The EU was thereafter criticised for reasserting its moral high ground when circumstances changed in its favour. Asians argued that the EU exploited temporary Asian weakness after the Asian Financial Crisis of 1997-1998 in order to resume their democracy and human rights agenda (Rüland 2012).…”

Section: Normative Power Europementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Interregional relations and legitimacy in global governance: the EU in ASEM

Jokela

Gaens

2012

Asia Eur J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Normative Power Europementioning

confidence: 99%

“…9 See, for example, Pelkmans and Shinkai 1997; Stokhof and van derVelde 1999Velde , 2001Gilson 2002;Yeo 2003;Stokhof et al 2004;Robles 2008;Rüland et al 2008;Gaens 2008; Yeo and Hofmeister 2010;Yeo 2011; and Bersick and van der Velde 2011. …”

mentioning

confidence: 97%

Interregional relations and legitimacy in global governance: the EU in ASEM

Jokela

Gaens

2012

Asia Eur J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…También está claro que no han sido ellos los que más utilizaron el foro para priorizar cuestiones como las promovidas por los países desarrollados. La idea de que las instituciones internacionales no resuelven problemas porque se han convertido en ámbitos de rivalidad desde la llegada de los países emergentes a las esferas de decisión mundial, como afirma Jürgen Rüland (2015), está lejos de lo sucedido en todas y cada una de las cumbres del G-20 6 . El "multilateralismo disminuido" que comenta Rüland, no ha sido por acción de los países emergentes.…”

Section: Desconfianza Y Rechazounclassified

Los países emergentes en el G-20 y la política seguida por Argentina

Miranda¹

2017

oasis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ResumenEn este artículo se analiza la presencia de los países emergentes en la gobernanza global a través de la participación desplegada por ellos en el G-20, con el fin de identificar la posición de Argentina en este ámbito multilateral, y determinar el uso que hizo de su poder como potencia media. Para cumplir con este objetivo consideramos las cumbres de jefes de Estado y de Gobierno del G-20, desde la primera realizada en Washington, en 2008, hasta la novena llevada a cabo en Brisbane, en 2014. Observamos que más allá de las diferencias y disputa de intereses, países desarrollados y emergentes convergieron en sostener las viejas instituciones internacionales como el FMI. Argentina, de participación intensa en las cumbres pero sin una estrategia de influencia, quedó fuera de esta coincidencia y perdió poder en las reformas producidas en los medios multilaterales de crédito.

show abstract

“…Whereas early literature on forum-shifting focused on rule-making, the concept is equally relevant to studying actors' efforts at norm-building and agenda-setting at the global level (Coleman 2013). Whether oriented towards establishing binding international law or appropriate standards of international behaviour, successful forum-shifting serves as an important power-enhancing strategy for states (and non-state actors), especially those that lack access to and/or prefer not to exercise raw power (Rüland 2012). …”

Section: Canada's Post-global Food Crisis Approach: Leadership or Formentioning

confidence: 99%

Canada at the G8 and UN Committee on World Food Security: forum-shifting in global food security governance

Margulis

2015

Canadian Foreign Policy Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Following the 2007-2008 Global Food Crisis, the Government of Canada doubled its aid spending on food security and made fighting world food insecurity a key foreign policy objective. The Government of Canada positioned itself for, and claims to enjoy, global leadership in global food security governance. This article examines the Government of Canada's behavior at two leading institutions for global food security governance, the Group of Eight (G8) and the United Nations Committee on World Food Security (CFS). I argue that the government has engaged in a forum-shifting strategy between these two institutions that has enhanced its reputation among a small group of peer states at the G8 but diminished its reputation and influence at the CFS. With the CFS emerging as a key institution for agenda-setting, norm-building and rule-making in global food security governance, Canada's marginal influence and peripheral status at this body undermines the government's claims of global leadership

show abstract

The rise of “diminished multilateralism”: East Asian and European forum shopping in global governance

Abstract: The article argues that the "principled multilateralism" of the immediate postCold War period is increasingly giving way to what may be called a "diminished multilateralism." Newly emerging global and regional powers such as the BRICS states (Brazil,

Cited by 24 publications

References 31 publications

Interregional relations and legitimacy in global governance: the EU in ASEM

Interregional relations and legitimacy in global governance: the EU in ASEM

Los países emergentes en el G-20 y la política seguida por Argentina

Canada at the G8 and UN Committee on World Food Security: forum-shifting in global food security governance

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About