Growth of per-capita income is associated with (i) significant shifts in the sectoral economic structure, (ii) systematic changes in relative prices and (iii) the Kaldor facts. Moreover, (iv) cross-sectional data shows systematic expenditure structure difference between rich and poor households. Ngai and Pissarides (2006) and Acemoglu and Guerrieri (2008) are consistent with observation (i)-(iii) but abstract form non-homotheticities of preferences. However, they cannot replicate the structural change between the U.S. goods and service sector quantitatively. This paper presents a growth model, which reconciles both forces of structural change -relative price and income effectswith balanced growth on the aggregate. The theory is simple and parsimonious and contains an analytical solution. The model can replicate shape and magnitude of the nonbalanced sectoral facts as well as the balanced nature of growth on the aggregate. In a structural estimation, the model's functional form is exploited to obtain estimates for the relative importance of income and price effects as determinants of the structural change.Keywords: Structural change, relative price effect, non-Gorman preferences, Kaldor facts. JEL classification: O14, O30, O41, D90. * I would like to thank Josef Falkinger, Reto Föllmi, Volker Grossmann, Marcus Hagedorn, Danyang Xie, Fabrizio Zilibotti and Josef Zweimüller for illuminating discussions. Moreover, I would like to thank Gregori Baetschmann, Victoria Galsband, Sandra Hanslin, Andreas Müller, Nick Netzer, Iryna Stewen, Raphael Studer and Franziska Weiss for many valuable comments and suggestions.