Allergic rhinitis and asthma constitute two clinical expressions of a single-condition, respiratory allergy. Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is a form of treatment specifically aimed at modifying the response to sensitizing allergens. The inherent potential benefit of AIT is the simultaneous treatment of all clinical expressions of respiratory allergy. Current data support the effectiveness of subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy in rhinitis. Studies also provide proof for a beneficial effect in allergic asthma. Even more, substantial evidence points to the preventive effect on the progression from rhinitis to asthma. Despite the current knowledge on the basic mechanisms underlying the immunological effect of AIT is vast, the specific mechanisms for the preventive effect of primary sensitization or new sensitizations are poorly understood. This review aimed to provide a critical overview of the current knowledge on the effectiveness of AIT and its potential role in secondary prevention of respiratory allergy progression.Respiratory allergy is nowadays considered a single condition which affects both upper and lower airways, integrated in the 'one-airway' concept. The association of allergic rhinitis (AR) and asthma has been extensively established, and the common mechanistic pathways leading to inflammation also share multiple characteristics. Also, it is well known that rhinitis frequently precedes the onset of asthma, allowing a window of opportunity for intervention (1). Initially, allergen immunotherapy (AIT) was empirically developed to treat AR in 1911, mirroring the emergence of the first vaccines in infectious diseases. Nowadays, we understand that one of the inherent potential benefits of AIT is the simultaneous treatment of all clinical expressions of respiratory allergy, that is from rhinoconjunctivitis to asthma (2). This is a major advantage, compared to some of the other pharmacological therapies which selectively treat one of the target organs. Also, data indicate that AIT has a carry-over effect beyond the period during which it is administered, somehow reverting the clinical expression of the disease. Furthermore, it may also be able to exert a preventive effect in two modes: decreasing the risk of developing asthma in patients who only suffer AR and diminishing the tendency of the allergic patients to become sensitized to further allergens (3). This review aimed to provide a critical overview of the current knowledge on the effectiveness of AIT and its potential role in secondary prevention of respiratory allergy progression.
Does immunotherapy for AR treat associated asthma?Subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy (SCIT) has extensively been evaluated in AR, as this has been the primary indication of AIT. Data provided by different meta-analysis of published trials have shown that it is an effective treatment, decreasing both symptom and medication scores (4, 5). In the last decades, sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) has become a widely used form of AIT. Again, meta-analysis of studies has ...