2012
DOI: 10.2500/ajra.2012.26.3811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Risk and Management of Anaphylaxis in the Setting of Immunotherapy

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The gold standard for immunotherapy route is the subcutaneous route due to its efficacy (56), but sublingual treatment is on the rise. Our finding with encapsulated OVA is of clinical relevance since one of the major drawbacks of allergen-specific treatment is the development of life-threating anaphylaxis (57). Although treatment of allergic mice with encapsulated allergen alone was effective in attenuating cutaneous anaphylaxis of allergic mice, this treatment was ineffective, in reversing established allergic lung inflammation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The gold standard for immunotherapy route is the subcutaneous route due to its efficacy (56), but sublingual treatment is on the rise. Our finding with encapsulated OVA is of clinical relevance since one of the major drawbacks of allergen-specific treatment is the development of life-threating anaphylaxis (57). Although treatment of allergic mice with encapsulated allergen alone was effective in attenuating cutaneous anaphylaxis of allergic mice, this treatment was ineffective, in reversing established allergic lung inflammation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Alergi terhadap lateks, bahan yang umumnya ada pada peralatan medis seperti sarung tangan, stetoskop, kateter, respirator, kondom, dan tabung drainase, juga dapat menyebabkan anafilaksis (Nguyen & Kohli, 2020). Penyakit asma tidak meningkatkan resiko untuk terjadinya reaksi, namun berdampak pada tingkat keparahan saat terjadinya reaksi (Lieberman, 2012).…”
Section: Usiaunclassified
“…In SCIT induction phases, the rate of systemic reactions is approximately 0.1–0.2% of injections and 2–5% of patients , while for SLIT, according to a review, the rate was 0.056% of doses . Uncontrolled asthma has been identified as an independent risk factor for serious adverse effects ; therefore, it is of major importance to assess asthma status initially upon prescription of AIT, and thereafter, before administration, as recommended by national and international guidelines .…”
Section: Safety Outcomes Of Aitmentioning
confidence: 99%