2007
DOI: 10.3905/jai.2007.682735
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Risk and Return Characteristics of the Buy-Write Strategy on the Russell 2000 Index

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given these two attractive components, the majority of the buy-write strategy (BWS) literature challenges the efficient market hypothesis of Fama (1970) and shows that it is possible to earn higher returns whilst simultaneously reducing risk. For instance, Hill and Gregory (2003), Whaley (2002), Feldman and Roy (2004), Hill et al, 2006, Kapadia andSzado (2007) demonstrate the success of the buy-write strategy in the US, and similar findings are observed in Switzerland 1 and Australia. 2 Board et al (2000) and Lhabitant (2000), on the other hand, argue otherwise, and Lhabitant (2000) concludes that further investigation of this product is necessary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given these two attractive components, the majority of the buy-write strategy (BWS) literature challenges the efficient market hypothesis of Fama (1970) and shows that it is possible to earn higher returns whilst simultaneously reducing risk. For instance, Hill and Gregory (2003), Whaley (2002), Feldman and Roy (2004), Hill et al, 2006, Kapadia andSzado (2007) demonstrate the success of the buy-write strategy in the US, and similar findings are observed in Switzerland 1 and Australia. 2 Board et al (2000) and Lhabitant (2000), on the other hand, argue otherwise, and Lhabitant (2000) concludes that further investigation of this product is necessary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…However, as the call options become deeper out-ofmoney, the benefits of the BWS are reduced as the hybrid product approximates the returns and risks of the physical stocks. Lhabitant (2000), Hill and Gregory (2003), Hill et al (2006), and Kapadia and Szado (2007) support the hypothesis that the level of out-of-moneyness affects the return of the BWS; however, there is no general consensus on the optimal level of out-of-moneyness. The remaining studies on BWS overlook the importance of the level of out-of-moneyness; wetherefore seek to analyse the impact of option out of moneyness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CSFB Equity Derivatives Strategy. 6 See for example Kapadia and Szado [2007] and Unger and Moran [2009] 6 provide significant diversification benefits in large downward moves of the market.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, writing/buying calls and/or puts during periods of heightened market volatility may be particularly advantageous/disadvantageous for credit/debit condor spreads (McKeon, 2016;Niblock and Sinnewe, forthcoming). Outperformance/underperformance of the market (e.g., ASX 200 index) could also be explained by the potential overpricing of written/bought call and/or puts options during such periods (Figelman, 2008;Hill et al, 2006;Kapadia and Szado, 2007;McIntyre and Jackson, 2007;O'Connell and O'Grady, 2014;Simon, 2011Simon, , 2013.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%