2022
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1225906/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The risk of COVID-19 death is much greater and age-dependent with type I IFN autoantibodies

Abstract: SARS-CoV-2 infection fatality rate (IFR) doubles with every five years of age from childhood onward. Circulating autoantibodies neutralizing IFN-α, IFN-ω, and/or IFN-β are found in ~20% of deceased patients across age groups. In the general population, they are found in ~1% of individuals aged 20-70 years and in >4% of those >70 years old. With a sample of 1,261 deceased patients and 34,159 uninfected individuals, we estimated both IFR and relative risk of death (RRD) across age groups for individuals ca… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 57 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An important question raised by our study is “what are the distinct pathophysiological phenomena of SARS-CoV-2 infection which underpin these observed differences between viral pneumonias?” While our study's retrospective design limits interpretation of our findings to hypothesis generation, several interesting patterns have nevertheless emerged. Age being the most important predictor of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia outcome - in the presence of fewer comorbidities than influenza - suggests that age-dependent, rather than acquired, immunosenescence may be more important in SARS-CoV-2-driven disease, 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 a finding with particular relevance given analogous responses to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein vaccines. 44 The degree to which these hypothesized pathogen-specific differences are due to variable virus-host cell receptor binding affinity, immune evasion, host response variance, or some combination thereof requires further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important question raised by our study is “what are the distinct pathophysiological phenomena of SARS-CoV-2 infection which underpin these observed differences between viral pneumonias?” While our study's retrospective design limits interpretation of our findings to hypothesis generation, several interesting patterns have nevertheless emerged. Age being the most important predictor of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia outcome - in the presence of fewer comorbidities than influenza - suggests that age-dependent, rather than acquired, immunosenescence may be more important in SARS-CoV-2-driven disease, 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 a finding with particular relevance given analogous responses to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein vaccines. 44 The degree to which these hypothesized pathogen-specific differences are due to variable virus-host cell receptor binding affinity, immune evasion, host response variance, or some combination thereof requires further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%