2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The risk of fever following one dose of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in children aged ≥6 months to <36 months: A comparison of published and unpublished studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent systematic review of fever by Kaczmarek et al following dose 1 of inactivated TIV, reported a similar rate (8.0%) for any fever in children aged six to < 36 months after non-adjuvanted TIV, using weighted average weekly risk [66]. However, our study, by using a proportion meta-analysis method, allowed inclusion of a broader range of studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…A recent systematic review of fever by Kaczmarek et al following dose 1 of inactivated TIV, reported a similar rate (8.0%) for any fever in children aged six to < 36 months after non-adjuvanted TIV, using weighted average weekly risk [66]. However, our study, by using a proportion meta-analysis method, allowed inclusion of a broader range of studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…We found TIV to be well tolerated by young children with adverse events experienced being predominantly mild or moderate in severity. Rates of fever after TIV were consistent with recent observational studies and systematic reviews of fever after inactivated influenza vaccination . No febrile seizures or SAEs were reported.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The number of study participants was determined from power calculations using estimates of the expected percentage of fever in vaccinees (5%–10%) 16 , 17 . A sample size of 865 was calculated to achieve the point estimate with 95% confidence intervals of 2%–5% absolute precision.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%