The risk of graft impingement still exists in modern ACL surgery and correlates with degenerative MRI signal changes

Abstract

Purpose Anatomic tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction is crucial to restore knee function. The aims of this study were to (i) evaluate the accuracy of tunnel placement for primary state-of-the-art ACL reconstruction, and (ii) examine the correlation between incorrect tunnel placement, graft appearance, and notch impingement. Methods In this retrospective study, all patients underwent primary single-bundle ACL reconstruction with independent drilling of the femoral and tibial tunnels according to anatomical landmarks. The accuracy of tunnel placement and the rate of notch impingement were analysed with MRI. The study cohort was subdivided according to the morphology of the graft: intact, degeneration, and re-rupture. The objective outcome was evaluated with the IKDC objective score, and the subjective outcomes were evaluated with the IKDC subjective score, the Lysholm knee score, the KOOS, and the Tegner activity scale score. Results Eighty-seven consecutive patients with a mean follow-up of 3.8 ± 1.4 years were evaluated. There was no signiicant diference among the groups concerning the baseline characteristics. The re-rupture rate was 9.2%. The position of the femoral tunnel was correct in 92% of the patients, and the position of the tibial tunnel was correct in 93% of the patients. In the intact group, impingement was not found in any of the cases, whereas the rate of impingement in the degeneration (65%) and re-rupture (80%) groups was signiicantly higher than that in the intact group (p < 0.001). The risk of impingement was more likely with femoral (71% vs. 13%, p < 0.001) or tibial (100% vs. 11%, p < 0.001) malpositioning. The objective IKDC score was A in 52 patients (60%), B in 26 patients (30%), and C in 9 patients (10%). The average subjective IKDC score, Lysholm score, and KOOS were comparable in the intact and degeneration groups but signiicantly lower in the patient group with newly diagnosed re-ruptures (p = 0.05). The Tegner activity scale score was comparable in all three groups. Conclusion Even though the accuracy of femoral tunnel placement in modern single-bundle ACL reconstruction is greater, the risk of malpositioning and graft impingement remains. In our patient cohort, there was a clear correlation between ACL graft impingement, degenerative changes in MRI, and incorrect tunnel positioning. The surgeon must focus on accurate tunnel placement speciic to individual patient anatomy. Level of evidence Level III.

ACL reconstruction with femoral and tibial adjustable versus fixed-loop suspensory fixation: a retrospective cohort study

“…A total of 396 patients were operated between 2012 and 2016, of which 351 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria (primary ACL reconstruction with quadrupled semitendinosus tendon with suspensory fixation on the femoral and tibial side). There has already been a publication out of this patient collective, covering a different research question with different subsamples (23). All patients with bilateral ACL reconstruction (n = 12), complex meniscal lesions (subtotal/total meniscectomy, complete meniscal root avulsions and complete radial tears-n = 15), as well as multiligamentous injuries (n = 10) and high-grade chondral lesions requiring surgical treatment (n = 9) were excluded from the study.…”

Reliability of the Tibial Spine Versus ACL Stump in Assisting Tibial Tunnel Positioning During ACL Reconstruction: Analysis Based on 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography Modeling

“…28 Anatomic positioning of the graft during ACL reconstruction plays an important role in restoring stability, preventing impingement, and lowering the risk of graft failure. 13,21 In anatomic ACL reconstruction, the tibial tunnel should be placed within the ACL footprint. The tibial spine can be regarded as a bony landmark for tibial tunnel positioning.…”

ACL reconstruction with femoral and tibial adjustable- versus fixed-loop suspensory fixation: A retrospective cohort study.

“…There has already been a publication out of this patient collective, covering a different research question with different subsamples. (19) All patients with bilateral ACL reconstruction (n=12), complex meniscal lesions (subtotal/total meniscectomy, complete meniscal root avulsions and complete radial tears -n=15), as well as multiligamentous injuries (n=10) and high-grade chondral lesions requiring surgical treatment (n=9) were excluded from the study. A total of 305 patients were invited to participate in the study, and 75 patients gave their informed consent.…”