2023
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dead036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The risk of miscarriage following COVID-19 vaccination: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Study Question What is the risk of miscarriage among pregnant women who received any of the COVID-19 vaccines? Summary Answer There is no evidence that COVID-19 vaccines are associated with an increased risk of miscarriage. What is Known Already In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the mass roll-out of vaccines helped to boost herd immunity and reduced hospi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, the evidence is rapidly growing that the coronavirus vaccination itself cannot be directly and biologically linked to the decline in births and fertility (Wang et al, 2023; Zaçe et al, 2022). This unanimous opinion is supported by a growing number of studies with different designs and on male and female fertility (Aharon et al, 2022; Ba et al, 2023; Barda et al, 2022; Gonzalez et al, 2021; Morris, 2021; Reschini et al, 2022; Yang et al, 2023; Yildiz et al, 2023) and miscarriage (Yland et al, 2023; Zauche et al, 2021), including already some review articles (Rimmer et al, 2023; Wesselink et al, 2022; Zhang et al, 2023; Zhu et al, 2023). Several studies report changes in the duration of menstrual cycle length following COVID-19 vaccination (Alvergne et al, 2023), but these changes are small (+/-1 day) and resume in the next cycle, thus not threatening fertility (Alvergne, 2023).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, the evidence is rapidly growing that the coronavirus vaccination itself cannot be directly and biologically linked to the decline in births and fertility (Wang et al, 2023; Zaçe et al, 2022). This unanimous opinion is supported by a growing number of studies with different designs and on male and female fertility (Aharon et al, 2022; Ba et al, 2023; Barda et al, 2022; Gonzalez et al, 2021; Morris, 2021; Reschini et al, 2022; Yang et al, 2023; Yildiz et al, 2023) and miscarriage (Yland et al, 2023; Zauche et al, 2021), including already some review articles (Rimmer et al, 2023; Wesselink et al, 2022; Zhang et al, 2023; Zhu et al, 2023). Several studies report changes in the duration of menstrual cycle length following COVID-19 vaccination (Alvergne et al, 2023), but these changes are small (+/-1 day) and resume in the next cycle, thus not threatening fertility (Alvergne, 2023).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent meta-analysis comprising 149 685 women, showed a relative risk for miscarriage of 0.71 (95% CI 0.89-1.28) in women vaccinated compared with controls. 25 A case-control study from the US Vaccine Safety Datalink included 13 160 cases with miscarriage and 92 286 controls with ongoing pregnancy and observed an odds ratio of 1.02 (95% CI 0.96-1.08) for miscarriage associated with SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in the preceding 28 days. 2 These estimates are also in keeping with other population-based registry studies from the Norway and Scotland.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings on SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccination and miscarriage are consistent with prior studies. A recent meta‐analysis comprising 149 685 women, showed a relative risk for miscarriage of 0.71 (95% CI 0.89–1.28) in women vaccinated compared with controls 25 . A case–control study from the US Vaccine Safety Datalink included 13 160 cases with miscarriage and 92 286 controls with ongoing pregnancy and observed an odds ratio of 1.02 (95% CI 0.96–1.08) for miscarriage associated with SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccination in the preceding 28 days 2 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early observational studies on vaccine effectiveness focused on reporting the effects of any COVID-19 vaccine in pregnancy on maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection 6–8. Subsequent reviews reporting pregnancy outcomes varied in their inclusion of studies, overlapped their search periods by only a few months and were rapidly outdated, limiting their relevance 9–12. Some reviews only included studies from specific regions or countries and did not provide a global outlook 13.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%