1991
DOI: 10.26509/frbc-wp-199109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Risk Premium in Forward Foreign Exchange Markets and G-3 Central Bank Intervention : Evidence of Daily Effects, 1985-1990

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies since the early 1990s have primarily focused on the signaling channel theory, which involves expectation formation and information transmission. Baillie and Humpage (1992) and Baillie and Osterberg (1991), used GARCH models to analyze exchange rate volatility and concluded that central bank interventions, although having a small effect on exchange rate levels, did not significantly affect volatility. However, Dominguez (1993) investigated the signaling channel for the USD/JPY and USD/MARK exchange rates between 1985 and 1991 using daily and weekly GARCH frameworks with a conditional Student t distribution and found that interventions effectively impacted exchange rate volatility, although the distinction between official and secret interventions affected the correlation between interventions and volatility measures.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies since the early 1990s have primarily focused on the signaling channel theory, which involves expectation formation and information transmission. Baillie and Humpage (1992) and Baillie and Osterberg (1991), used GARCH models to analyze exchange rate volatility and concluded that central bank interventions, although having a small effect on exchange rate levels, did not significantly affect volatility. However, Dominguez (1993) investigated the signaling channel for the USD/JPY and USD/MARK exchange rates between 1985 and 1991 using daily and weekly GARCH frameworks with a conditional Student t distribution and found that interventions effectively impacted exchange rate volatility, although the distinction between official and secret interventions affected the correlation between interventions and volatility measures.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%