1955
DOI: 10.2307/536771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Ritual View of Myth and the Mythic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The goal is therefore not to argue from a moral stance what is just, fair or objectionable, but merely what is functional to maintaining the social system's order. 2 See Himmelstein (1984), Hyman (1955), and Raglan (1955) for a discussion of the interrelationship between myth and ritual. 3 In a rare attempt at examining the effects of fiction and nonfiction, Atkins (1983) conducted an experimental study exposing two groups of subjects alternatively to realistic and fictitious television violence in a laboratory setting.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal is therefore not to argue from a moral stance what is just, fair or objectionable, but merely what is functional to maintaining the social system's order. 2 See Himmelstein (1984), Hyman (1955), and Raglan (1955) for a discussion of the interrelationship between myth and ritual. 3 In a rare attempt at examining the effects of fiction and nonfiction, Atkins (1983) conducted an experimental study exposing two groups of subjects alternatively to realistic and fictitious television violence in a laboratory setting.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of "ritual" has quite properly been associated with myth criticism, but if we examine John B. Vickery's classic collection of essays in this field, Myth and Literature, we may find that as late as the 1960s myth critics held certain notions about ritual that are no longer ten-able. Stanley Edgar Hyman's 1958 essay in that collection stands as the most confident assertion of these beliefs. A great student of Darwin's prose, Hyman seems to view literary theory as undergoing its own modest evolution within the larger progress of the human sciences, from E. B. Tylor's Primitive Culture to James G. Frazer's Golden Bough and the applications of Frazer by the so-called Cambridge school of criticism (Jane Harrison, Gilbert Murray, A.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%