2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10980-021-01257-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The riverine thruway hypothesis: rivers as a key mediator of gene flow for the aquatic paradoxical frog Pseudis tocantins (Anura, Hylidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future work explicitly testing pulse migration versus continuous migration models of gene flow may help clarify the relative contributions of these two nonmutually exclusive mechanisms. Nevertheless, the explicit assumption of the framework presented here is that the underlying lowland riverine landscape is not stable, which has also been confirmed, for instance, on the easternmost Amazonian part of the Brazilian Shield (66,67). Within this conceptual framework, drainage network evolution is a simple solution to the question of how secondary contact occurs between differentiated taxa that are otherwise isolated by rivers.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Future work explicitly testing pulse migration versus continuous migration models of gene flow may help clarify the relative contributions of these two nonmutually exclusive mechanisms. Nevertheless, the explicit assumption of the framework presented here is that the underlying lowland riverine landscape is not stable, which has also been confirmed, for instance, on the easternmost Amazonian part of the Brazilian Shield (66,67). Within this conceptual framework, drainage network evolution is a simple solution to the question of how secondary contact occurs between differentiated taxa that are otherwise isolated by rivers.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…We find a great deal of concordance among landscape genetics inferences at the 1225‐, 2500‐ and 4225‐km 2 spatial scales in both our visual assessment of the circuitscape surfaces and based on correlation tests, where river canyons appear to be important features maintaining genetic connectivity. In this case, it appears that the abiotic environment within river canyons—higher temperatures, less seasonality in temperature and precipitation, less rugged areas—are the landscape features that promote connectivity, rather than the rivers within the canyons themselves, as is presumably the case for amphibians such as the foothill yellow‐legged frog ( Rana boylii ; Lind et al, 2011) and the aquatic paradoxical frog ( Pseudis tocantins ; Fonseca et al, 2021). The larger spatial scale circuitscape layer at 6400 km 2 also largely identified river canyons as facilitators to gene flow, but demonstrated a low correlation with the other spatial layers (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dispersal primarily along creek lines (2) rather than through terrestrial landscapes may contribute to isolation of populations. For some aquatic and semi aquatic species, patterns of gene ow re ect the hierarchical nature of river systems and/or the isolation of populations to independent river basins or drainages (Brauer et al 2016;Coa et al 2020;Fonseca et al 2021). Whilst the river catchments on the Woronora Plateau are geographically close to each other, they are parts of different major river drainages (Fig.…”
Section: Population Structurementioning
confidence: 99%