2004
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkh616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The RmInt1 group II intron has two different retrohoming pathways for mobility using predominantly the nascent lagging strand at DNA replication forks for priming

Abstract: Sinorhizobium meliloti RmInt1 is an efficient mobile group II intron that uses an unknown reverse transcriptase priming mechanism as the intron ribonucleoprotein complex can reverse splice into DNA target substrates but cannot carry out site-specific second strand cleavage due to the lack of a C-terminal DNA endonuclease domain. We show here that, like other mobile group II introns, RmInt1 moves around by an efficient RNA-based retrohoming mechanism. We found evidence of two distinct RmInt1 retrohoming pathway… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
83
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
83
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These events could even take advantage of lagging strand nicks created during S phase, as observed for the RmInt1 group II intron. 69 The reason for the excess of DSBs in the L1 retrotransposition process is not understood at this time. The DSB intermediates in the retrotransposition process may be repaired efficiently most of the time and therefore do not result in an insertion event (see Figure 1).…”
Section: Mechanistic Implications Of L1 Dsbsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These events could even take advantage of lagging strand nicks created during S phase, as observed for the RmInt1 group II intron. 69 The reason for the excess of DSBs in the L1 retrotransposition process is not understood at this time. The DSB intermediates in the retrotransposition process may be repaired efficiently most of the time and therefore do not result in an insertion event (see Figure 1).…”
Section: Mechanistic Implications Of L1 Dsbsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most CL and B introns encode RTs with an En domain, while lineages A, C, D, E, and F introns encode proteins lacking this domain (denoted En À group II introns) Toro et al 2007;Simon et al 2008). One En À group IIB intron, the Sinorhizobium melilotti RmInt1 intron, has been shown to retrohome efficiently by using a nascent strand at a DNA replication fork to prime reverse transcription (Martínez-Abarca et al 2004). Group IIC introns have the smallest intron RNAs, encode proteins lacking an En domain, and rely on En-independent mechanisms for mobility (Robart et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike intron Ll.LtrA of Lactococcus lactis, which currently serves as paradigm for group II intron mobility (for review, see Lambowitz and Zimmerly 2004), the RmInt1 intron-encoded protein lacks C-terminal DNA endonuclease and DNA-binding domains (Martínez-Abarca et al 2000;Zimmerly et al 2001;Dai and Zimmerly 2002a;San Filippo and Lambowitz 2002;Toro 2003). RmInt1 is nevertheless an efficient mobile element that has two retrohoming pathways for mobility, with predominant use of the nascent lagging strand at DNA replication forks for priming (Martínez-Abarca et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%