“…First generation (1G) renewable raw materials, exemplified by corn starch, sugar cane, and sugar beet, are not perceived as sustainable options in the long term as their utilization involves, directly, or indirectly, competition with food production. In contrast, the use of second generation (2G) renewable biomass, in the form of waste polysaccharides, such as lignocellulose (Liguori and Faraco, 2016;Zhang et al, 2017) and pectin, from agricultural and forestry residues and food supply chain waste (Dahiya et al, 2018), is perceived as a sustainable long term option for producing biofuels and commodity chemicals (Sheldon, 2014(Sheldon, , 2016(Sheldon, , 2018Horváth et al, 2017). Looking further afield, third generation (3G) aquatic biomass, such as micro-and macro-algae and cyanobacteria, has additional advantages (John et al, 2011;Al Abdallah et al, 2016;Shuba and Kifle, 2018).…”