The Road to Developing an Advanced Degree Program in Public Health Preparedness

Abstract

The master of homeland security (MHS) degree in public health preparedness at the Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine is the first degree program of its kind offered by any U.S. medical school. The field of public health preparedness has been increasingly viewed as a new, emerging professional discipline, which academic medicine is well positioned to complement. The process by which the MHS program has evolved from conception to realization is a case study in the mission-based alignment of core values and leadership between the government and academic medicine. Recognizing the need for multidisciplinary involvement, the program architects reconsidered the traditional approach to the development and implementation of new graduate degree programs. Instead, a more flexible, loosely connected network of strategic partners and alliances was adopted. These partnerships were developed and cultivated by vested individuals who excelled in specific core competencies and came together to create value. This allowed for both the expertise and flexibility needed to adapt quickly to the evolving homeland security environment in the United States. To that end, this article describes the 10-step multidisciplinary program-development process that spanned three years and culminated in the establishment of this new graduate degree program. The MHS program as it now stands focuses on public health preparedness, including epidemiological evaluation, disaster communication and psychology, agricultural biosecurity, and critical infrastructure protection. The program is geared toward the practicing professional already working in the field, and its graduates are positioned to be among the top leaders, educators, and researchers in homeland security.

Attributes of Effective Disaster Responders: Focus Group Discussions With Key Emergency Response Leaders

“…Specific competencies in disaster preparedness and response are essential to effective performance in disasters. Consequently, training curricula for various health-related disciplines increasingly incorporate education and such competencies 111213141516171819202122232425. To address rapidly evolving training needs, educators must continue to learn from actual disasters, identify attributes that distinguish effective from ineffective workers, and update competency frameworks and training programs accordingly.…”