2012
DOI: 10.1109/tr.2012.2221032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Robust Deviation Redundancy Allocation Problem With Interval Component Reliabilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Hussain and Murthy (2003), the uncertain component failure rate has been modeled by a reliability growth model, and an optimization model has been proposed to find the best trade-off between the development cost and the warranty cost. Feizollahi and Modarres (2012) proposed a reliability design framework to address the uncertain component failure rates by using the Min-Max regret (also known as robust deviation) approach and transformed the nonlinear programming formulation to a linear binary version to get the exact solutions. None of the above works considered interval availability.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Hussain and Murthy (2003), the uncertain component failure rate has been modeled by a reliability growth model, and an optimization model has been proposed to find the best trade-off between the development cost and the warranty cost. Feizollahi and Modarres (2012) proposed a reliability design framework to address the uncertain component failure rates by using the Min-Max regret (also known as robust deviation) approach and transformed the nonlinear programming formulation to a linear binary version to get the exact solutions. None of the above works considered interval availability.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, for an uncertain mixed integer programming (MIP) problem with interval data, solving robust counterparts for budgeted uncertainty sets is much easier than finding the minmax regret solution. For example, in redundancy allocation problems, this difference is obvious by comparing the results in [48][49][50][51], respectively. In addition, former method can find solutions with different levels of conservativeness, while the latter approach outputs only one conservative solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several other papers proposed the constrained RAP with interval valued reliability of each component [19][20][21][22]. Although several approaches have been proposed for system reliability optimization considering uncertainty, these approaches have not considered uncertain stress directly as it relates to component and system reliability and risk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For system reliability evaluation, Feizollahi et al [22] proposed the linear-transformed optimization model with constraints. They implemented robust deviation called minimax regret to address uncertainty of component reliability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%