2017
DOI: 10.3905/jii.2017.8.3.075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Robustness of the Volatility Factor:Linear versus Nonlinear Factor Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As noted by Tierney (1994), the answer depends largely on the specific algorithms employed to implement the sampling process and how consistent the data are with the presumed underlying data generating process. In a study of financial market indices, de Franco et al (2017) find that 20,000 draws are more than sufficient, whereas LeSage and Pace (2018) suggest, although do not test, that 1000 draws may be sufficient. For this study, we use 25,000 draws and to minimize the risk associated with poor starting values, we remove or “throw away” the first 1000 draws from the analysis (i.e., a burn‐in rate of 1000).…”
Section: Empirical Model and Statistical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As noted by Tierney (1994), the answer depends largely on the specific algorithms employed to implement the sampling process and how consistent the data are with the presumed underlying data generating process. In a study of financial market indices, de Franco et al (2017) find that 20,000 draws are more than sufficient, whereas LeSage and Pace (2018) suggest, although do not test, that 1000 draws may be sufficient. For this study, we use 25,000 draws and to minimize the risk associated with poor starting values, we remove or “throw away” the first 1000 draws from the analysis (i.e., a burn‐in rate of 1000).…”
Section: Empirical Model and Statistical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%