2017
DOI: 10.1017/cts.2017.308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Rockefeller University Clinical Scholars (KL2) program 2006–2016

Abstract: Introduction and Methods The Rockefeller Clinical Scholars (KL2) Program began in 1976 and transitioned into a 3-year Master’s degree program in 2006 when Rockefeller joined the NIH Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) program. The program consists of ~15 trainees supported by the CTSA KL2 award and University funds. It is designed to provide an optimal environment for junior translational investigators to develop team science and leadership skills by designing and performing a human subjects protoc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their charge was to identify the types of initiatives developed by CTSA hubs to support KL2 scholars, which resulted in a series of "white papers" focused on approaches to strengthen the career development of clinical translational scientist trainees [1], and elements of mentoring [2][3][4][5][6][7]. Most reports of specific KL2 program practices and scholar outcomes focus on single institution experiences, representing large, unique, and/or wellresourced programs of greater longevity [8][9][10][11]. Given the evolution of CTR core competencies [12][13], of heterogeneous approaches to KL2 scholar training, and expansion of the CTSA consortium to include newer programs with smaller scholar cohorts, this survey now focuses on CTSA hub-reported program practices and scholar outcomes in the contemporary era.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their charge was to identify the types of initiatives developed by CTSA hubs to support KL2 scholars, which resulted in a series of "white papers" focused on approaches to strengthen the career development of clinical translational scientist trainees [1], and elements of mentoring [2][3][4][5][6][7]. Most reports of specific KL2 program practices and scholar outcomes focus on single institution experiences, representing large, unique, and/or wellresourced programs of greater longevity [8][9][10][11]. Given the evolution of CTR core competencies [12][13], of heterogeneous approaches to KL2 scholar training, and expansion of the CTSA consortium to include newer programs with smaller scholar cohorts, this survey now focuses on CTSA hub-reported program practices and scholar outcomes in the contemporary era.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We try to emphasize that we do not expect Scholars to master all of the team science competencies rapidly, but rather want to help them identify the key skills and attributes needed and intentionally plot a multi-year path to achieve the goal that can be incorporated into the Scholar's Individual Development Plan. We previously developed a Graduate Tracking Survey System (GTSS) [1,12] to assess the progress of our Scholars after graduation and it provides outcome data on our Scholars' success as translational science team leaders. Over time, by merging the process-based assessments generated by the survey with the outcome data from the GTSS, we hope to gain a better understanding of the factors that are associated with Team Science Leadership success.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By combining our domain-specific expertise and experience, we created a list of competencies that we assessed to be essential for an outstanding translational scientist to lead a multidisciplinary team in conducting a human participant research protocol (Supplemental Figure 1). All 15 Senior Staff members participated in a modified Delphi method [1,8,9] for generating and reviewing both the major domains and the items within domains. Over the course of 6 months of weekly meetings, the domains were first agreed upon, and then the items within domain were created, deleted, and revised until neither new items nor major revisions were suggested.…”
Section: Team Science Leadership Competencies and Teams Science Leadership Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The primary large-scale effort to systematically track KL2 outcomes is the Rockefeller University Graduate Tracking Survey System, which supplements scholar survey data with secondary datasets on grants and publications [21,22]. While more consistent and comprehensive data collection is an improvement over idiosyncratic single-institution follow-ups, its creators underscore the lack of a comparison group against which to benchmark.…”
Section: Previous Evaluations Of Kl2 Training Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%