2018
DOI: 10.1080/10357718.2018.1548563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Rohingya jurisdiction decision: a step forward for stopping forced deportations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Myanmar is not party to the Rome Statute, which created the court, and any attempt to force the ICC to take a case through the UN Security Council would almost certainly be blocked by China, and probably by Russia as well. Nevertheless, since Bangladesh is party to the Rome Statute, and the Rohingya fled across the border, the ICC ruled in 2018 that it had jurisdiction over the case (Colvin and Orchard 2019). As a result, in November 2019, the ICC approved a full investigation into the allegations of 'systematic acts of violence', deportation as a crime against humanity, and persecution on the grounds of ethnicity or religion against the Rohingya (AFP 2019).…”
Section: International Justice?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Myanmar is not party to the Rome Statute, which created the court, and any attempt to force the ICC to take a case through the UN Security Council would almost certainly be blocked by China, and probably by Russia as well. Nevertheless, since Bangladesh is party to the Rome Statute, and the Rohingya fled across the border, the ICC ruled in 2018 that it had jurisdiction over the case (Colvin and Orchard 2019). As a result, in November 2019, the ICC approved a full investigation into the allegations of 'systematic acts of violence', deportation as a crime against humanity, and persecution on the grounds of ethnicity or religion against the Rohingya (AFP 2019).…”
Section: International Justice?mentioning
confidence: 99%