The Role and Effectiveness of Telephone Peer Coaching for Adult Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

McGowan, Patrick; Lynch, S.; Hensen, Frances

doi:10.1016/j.jcjd.2019.03.006

Cited by 18 publications

(34 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…49,51 Even telephone peer coaching is found to significantly improve general health, fatigue, patient activation, diabetes empowerment, self-efficacy, depression, levels of HbA1c and communication with physician. 52 The complexity and diversity of DM control indicates the need to think and implement empowerment strategies formed by an interdisciplinary team (IDT). Jiao et al., in 2016, have shown that the performance of an IDT can be effective and reduce macrovascular complications of DM.…”

Section: Empowerment Of Persons With Dmmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Self-management and outcomes of DM are increased through the use of self-management strategies. 34,38,52 DSME should be customised, meet the person's needs and take into account personal characteristics, such as medical history, age, health beliefs and attitudes, diabetes knowledge, physical limitations, family support and financial status. 24,25 Moreover, healthcare providers should emphasise cultural beliefs in self-care management programmes.…”

Section: Self-management Educationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Lifestyle factors, self-management and patient empowerment in diabetes care

Lambrinou

Hansen

Beulens³

2019

Eur J Prev Cardiolog

171

101

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although management of diabetes mellitus is improving, inadequately managed cases still exist. Prevention of diabetes mellitus requires an integrated and holistic approach based on the origin of the disease. In Europe only half of diagnosed patients with diabetes mellitus have good glycaemic control. Inadequate glycaemic control is significantly increasing the use of healthcare resources, the medical costs and mortality rates. A review was conducted in order to summarise and discuss central themes for prevention. A search of the databases PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane and Google Scholar between January 2010–May 2019 was undertaken. The following keywords: ‘diabetes mellitus’, ‘cardiovascular diseases’, ‘empowerment’, ‘self-management education’ and ‘lifestyle factors’ were used in different combinations to identify eligible articles. Important variables for the prevention of diabetes mellitus and its complications are self-management of diabetes mellitus and the management of risk factors. Education and support for self-management are fundamental when caring for people with a chronic disease like diabetes mellitus. In order to achieve effective self-management including lifestyle modification it is also crucial to motivate people. In this review, the role of the three main pillars in diabetes care are identified and discussed; patient empowerment, self-management education and lifestyle modification in the management of people with diabetes mellitus.

show abstract

Section: Empowerment Of Persons With Dmmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Self-management Educationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Lifestyle factors, self-management and patient empowerment in diabetes care

Lambrinou

Hansen

Beulens³

2019

Eur J Prev Cardiolog

171

101

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The articles included for the analyses ranged from 2003 to 2019 and were conducted in 13 different countries. The majority of the studies were conducted in the USA (n. 15) [ 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 ]; three in Iran [ 45 , 46 , 47 ] and Korea [ 8 , 48 , 49 ]; two in Canada [ 50 , 51 ] and the UK [ 52 , 53 ]; one in China [ 7 ], Belgium [ 6 ], Bulgaria [ 54 ], Hong Kong [ 55 ], Japan [ 56 ], Malaysia [ 57 ], Mexico [ 58 ], and Taiwan [ 59 ]. Considering articles’ design the majority (n. 21) was a Randomized Control Trial [ 7 , 8 , 30 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 41 , 45 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 57 ]; seven were a pre-post study [ ...…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Fourteen articles considered all these different types of outcomes together [ 6 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 34 , 38 , 40 , 44 , 49 , 50 , 52 , 54 , 57 , 59 ]; one article considered behavioral, psychological, and literacy outcomes [ 43 ]; one article considered clinical, behavioral, and psychological outcomes [ 49 ]; one article considered clinical, psychological, and literacy outcomes [ 41 ]; one article considered psychological and literacy outcomes [ 45 ]; one article considered behavioral and literacy outcomes [ 51 ]; six articles considered only clinical outcomes [ 33 , 35 , 39 , 48 , 56 , 58 ]; four articles considered only literacy [ 36 , 37 , 42 , 53 ]; and four articles considered only psychological outcomes [ 7 , 46 , 47 , 55 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Seven articles described some kind of participation of the patients or the families into the definition or the adjustment of the intervention [ 30 , 31 , 34 , 37 , 41 , 46 , 54 ] in order to consider their opinion and to better target the intervention itself. Three articles included an evaluation of patient adherence to the treatment or the prescriptions [ 45 , 50 , 56 ] together with broader quality-of-life or empowerment measures. Three included the concept of patient activation [ 43 , 49 , 50 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Educational Interventions for Promoting Food Literacy and Patient Engagement in Preventing Complications of Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review

Savarese

Sapienza

Acquati

et al. 2021

JPM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present review aims to map the current literature on educational interventions to promote food literacy in type 2 diabetes, with a particular focus on the concept of patient engagement. The systematic review was implemented on five databases with no restrictions on the publication year. The studies selected for the review were focused on patients with type 2 diabetes, ranging from 2003 to 2021 and published in 13 countries (44% USA). Thirty-three articles were analyzed. Twenty-seven articles targeted singular patients; fifteen articles conceptualized patient engagement as self-management. In seven articles, the provider is a multidisciplinary team. Twenty articles did not report a theoretical framework in the intervention development, and eleven did not use an intervention material. Twenty-six articles did not use a technology proxy. Outcome categories were narratively mapped into four areas: clinical, psychological, behavioral, and literacy. To date, most of the interventions are heterogeneous in the adopted methodology, measures, and outcomes considered. More attention should be given to the psychosocial characterization of patient engagement as well as the technological support. High-quality, randomized controlled trials and longitudinal studies are lacking and need to be conducted to verify the efficacy of these insights.

show abstract

Patient perspective on barriers in type 2 diabetes self‐management: A qualitative study

Tuobenyiere,

Mensah,

Korsah

2023

Nursing Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AimTo explore the perceived barriers in Type 2 Diabetes care among patients with diabetes. Design The study adopted a qualitative exploratory‐descriptive design.MethodsA semi‐structured interview guide was used to collect data from fifteen (15) purposively sampled patients with Type 2 Diabetes at a primary level health facility in the Bono East region. Participants' ages ranged between 42–72 years. The interviews were audio‐recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic content analysis.ResultsPatients with Type 2 Diabetes encountered a range of barriers in diabetes care. These barriers included lack of knowledge of diabetes dietary management strategies, financial constraints, non‐compliance to treatment, lack of glucometers, lack of social support, and increased waiting time at health care facilities. The findings indicate that more education on diabetes and dietary management is required as well as social support from peers, family, and non‐governmental organizations.Patient or public contributionDiabetes self‐management barriers as revealed by the patients who were participants of this study requires nurses and midwives to ensure that self‐management education is well understood by patients and their relatives. This would empower the patients and bring clarity to their confusion about self‐care practices.

show abstract

The Role and Effectiveness of Telephone Peer Coaching for Adult Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

Cited by 18 publications

References 36 publications

Lifestyle factors, self-management and patient empowerment in diabetes care

Lifestyle factors, self-management and patient empowerment in diabetes care

Educational Interventions for Promoting Food Literacy and Patient Engagement in Preventing Complications of Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review

Patient perspective on barriers in type 2 diabetes self‐management: A qualitative study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About