2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2015.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of a microDiamond detector in the dosimetry of proton pencil beams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Diamond detectors can be produced in small sizes (compared to standard dosimeters, such as cylindrical or plane-parallel ionization chambers), so they can be easily placed in different experimental setups and anatomical structures of irradiated phantoms, as well as be deployed for in vivo dosimetery [48]. Diamond detectors have already been used in dosimetry of proton pencil beams [49]. They have also been employed in FLASH experiments, and no significant dose-rate dependency has been found for dose rates up to 40 Gy/s [9].…”
Section: Active Detectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diamond detectors can be produced in small sizes (compared to standard dosimeters, such as cylindrical or plane-parallel ionization chambers), so they can be easily placed in different experimental setups and anatomical structures of irradiated phantoms, as well as be deployed for in vivo dosimetery [48]. Diamond detectors have already been used in dosimetry of proton pencil beams [49]. They have also been employed in FLASH experiments, and no significant dose-rate dependency has been found for dose rates up to 40 Gy/s [9].…”
Section: Active Detectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed decrease in R Q =R Q 0 at the effective photon energy of 13.9 keV (25 kV beam spectrum) could be due to detector under-response when the linear energy transfer (LET) of secondary electrons increases. An under-response of a microDiamond was reported in high-LET carbon and oxygen beams, 7 but in proton beams the reported results were inconclusive indicating either no significant LET dependence 7,8 or under-response. 6 The R Q =R Q 0 values are higher only at the lowest energies and approach unity with increasing energy.…”
Section: A2 MC Simulations Of Effects Associated With Detector Dementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commercially available synthetic diamond detectors microDiamond (PTW 60019, Freiburg, Germany) have been used in small-field dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams, [1][2][3][4] as well as in proton and carbon beams. [5][6][7][8] These studies showed that the detectors have low absorbed-dose energy dependence, negligible dose-rate dependence and do not require high pre-irradiation doses (up to 2 Gy). These characteristics shown in high-energy beams combined with the closeness of the effective atomic numbers of water and carbon prompted a question about diamond detector's applicability in low-energy photon beams, such as BT and diagnostic x-ray fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Beddar et al [ 7 , 8 ] demonstrated that characteristics such as water equivalence, fast response time, and dose-rate responses of plastic scintillators qualify them for external beam radiation therapy. At the CPT, the response of several detectors has been tested and characterized to understand their suitability for proton dosimetry [ 9 , 10 , 11 ]. Different types of scintillating fibers generally have different light emission spectra, light outputs, and levels of quenching.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%