1973
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of a reactive disulphide bond in the function of the acetylcholine receptor at the frog neuromuscular junction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

5
28
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
5
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sigmoid movement depends on acetylcholine (ACh) neurotransmission as well but in our experiments appears unaffected by heat shock treatment. These results concurred with reports that ROS actions do not deactivate nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChR) at the neuromuscular junction (Ben-Haim et al 1973;Giniatullin et al 2005) On the contrary, ROS and heat shock inhibit or deactivate enzyme acetylcholinesterase (Eichler and Silman 1995), keeping the ACh action longer in the synaptic cleft.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Sigmoid movement depends on acetylcholine (ACh) neurotransmission as well but in our experiments appears unaffected by heat shock treatment. These results concurred with reports that ROS actions do not deactivate nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChR) at the neuromuscular junction (Ben-Haim et al 1973;Giniatullin et al 2005) On the contrary, ROS and heat shock inhibit or deactivate enzyme acetylcholinesterase (Eichler and Silman 1995), keeping the ACh action longer in the synaptic cleft.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…If there are prejunctional cholinoceptors, DTT could reduce the action of ACh at this site and consequently diminish ADF directly by reducing the affinity of ACh for these receptors, if they are of the same type as those on the postjunctional membrane (Ben-Haim, Landau & Silman, 1973;Terrar, 1978) or like those in ganglia (Brown & Kwiatkowski, 1976;Bleehen, Clark & Hobbiger, 1983;see Webb & Bowman, 1974). Alternatively, DTT might reduce the prejunctional effect of ACh indirectly by an action on postjunctional cholinoceptors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the presence of an anticholinesterase, the diffusion of ACh from the synaptic cleft is delayed by its binding to postjunctional cholinoceptors (Katz & Miledi, 1973;Magleby & Terrar, 1975). Following exposure to DTT the affinity of ACh for these receptors is reduced (Ben-Haim, 1973;Terrar, 1978) and thus ACh would be expected to leave the synaptic cleft more rapidly (Terrar, 1976).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of a disulfide bond has been confirmed with other ACh-receptor preparations : rat denervated muscle (ALBUQUERQUE et al, 1968), frog rectus (MITTAG and TORMAY, 1970), chick biventer cervix (RANG and BITTER, 1971), frog sartorius (DEL CASTILLO et al, 1971;BEN-HAIM et a!., 1973), and leech muscle (Ross and TRIGGLE,1972). However, it should be noted that the ACh-receptors studied so far were all excitatory, and curare-sensitive type.…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%