2015
DOI: 10.1586/14737140.2016.1115724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of adjuvant therapy in uterine leiomyosarcoma

Abstract: Summary Uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS) is a rare mesenchymal tumor of the gynecologic tract. Although diagnosed in only 1-3% of patients with uterine cancer, uLMS accounts for the majority of uterine cancer-related deaths. The standard of care for patients with uLMS includes total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO). There are no standard recommendations regarding adjuvant or palliative therapy. Many cytotoxic and targeted agents have been studied in clinical trials in an effort to identify a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
18
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2018, Friedman and Hensley [22] published an interesting review on uterine LMS and concluded that neither adjuvant radiotherapy nor chemotherapy affects the prognosis of uterineconfined, completely resected LMS. The review by Ducie et al [23] reached the same conclusion; Ducie et al reported that there was also no proven benefit of chemotherapy for completely resected advanced stages of the disease, although it was commonly considered. They also reported that doxorubicin, with or without other agents, had been chosen as an adjuvant treatment because of its success in achieving a 30% response in measurable disease and that years later, the combination of gemcitabine/docetaxel had become the favoured protocol, as it achieved response rates that could reach 53%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In 2018, Friedman and Hensley [22] published an interesting review on uterine LMS and concluded that neither adjuvant radiotherapy nor chemotherapy affects the prognosis of uterineconfined, completely resected LMS. The review by Ducie et al [23] reached the same conclusion; Ducie et al reported that there was also no proven benefit of chemotherapy for completely resected advanced stages of the disease, although it was commonly considered. They also reported that doxorubicin, with or without other agents, had been chosen as an adjuvant treatment because of its success in achieving a 30% response in measurable disease and that years later, the combination of gemcitabine/docetaxel had become the favoured protocol, as it achieved response rates that could reach 53%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In the present study, we found that CS patients receiving lymphadenectomy had significantly higher OS, in line with the literature. The gold standard of management for LMS is surgery, and patients with suspected or confirmed LMS should have their uterus removed en bloc, with maximal effort to avoid intraoperative rupture or spillage of the tumour into the peritoneal cavity [15]. The incidence of retroperitoneal lymph node metastases is low for LMS; therefore, pelvic and paraaortic lymph node dissection is not recommended in routine practice, even for patients who have been found to have lymph node involvement [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After a thorough bibliographic examination, the patient was interviewed to schedule the most appropriate follow-up and to discuss potential adjuvant therapy. The efficacy of systemic adjuvant therapy (15) and intraperitoneal hyperthermia is unclear, and there is no evidence for an absolute benefit of adjuvant therapy compared with surgery alone (16,17,18). Therefore, with the patient's agreement, given the high probability of disease recurrence, we decided on a follow up consisting…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%