2008
DOI: 10.1017/s1743921309029391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of aerodynamic drag in dynamics of coronal mass ejections

Abstract: Abstract. Dynamics of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) is strongly affected by the interaction of the erupting structure with the ambient magnetoplasma: eruptions that are faster than solar wind transfer the momentum and energy to the wind and generally decelerate, whereas slower ones gain the momentum and accelerate. Such a behavior can be expressed in terms of "aerodynamic" drag. We employ a large sample of CMEs to analyze the relationship between kinematics of CMEs and drag-related parameters, such as ambient … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The importance of drag becomes further apparent through the CME interaction with a slow-speed solar wind stream ahead of it, slowing it to a speed that accounts for the observed arrival time at L1 near Earth. This agrees with the conjecture that Sun-Earth transit time is more closely related to the solar wind speed than the initial CME speed 52 . Other kinematic studies of this CME through the HI fields-of-view quote velocities of 411 ± 23 km s −1 (Ahead) and 417 ± 15 km s −1 (Behind) when assumed to have zero acceleration during this late phase of propagation 34 , or an average of 363 ± 43 km s −1 when triangulated in time-elongation J-maps 36 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The importance of drag becomes further apparent through the CME interaction with a slow-speed solar wind stream ahead of it, slowing it to a speed that accounts for the observed arrival time at L1 near Earth. This agrees with the conjecture that Sun-Earth transit time is more closely related to the solar wind speed than the initial CME speed 52 . Other kinematic studies of this CME through the HI fields-of-view quote velocities of 411 ± 23 km s −1 (Ahead) and 417 ± 15 km s −1 (Behind) when assumed to have zero acceleration during this late phase of propagation 34 , or an average of 363 ± 43 km s −1 when triangulated in time-elongation J-maps 36 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The drag-based model is often used assuming that the Lorentz and gravity forces decrease such that the drag force can largely govern CME dynamics far from the Sun. Although it is not proven that drag is the only force that shapes CME dynamics in the interplanetary medium, the observed deceleration/acceleration of some CMEs has been closely reproduced by considering only the drag force acting between the CME and the ambient solar wind medium (Lindsay et al 1999;Cargill 2004;Manoharan 2006;Vršnak et al 2009;Lara & Borgazzi 2009). In the STEREO era, with the formulation of several 3D reconstruction methods, the 3D kinematics of CMEs estimated in COR2 and HI FOV is used to estimate their arrival time at Earth (Mishra & Srivastava 2013;Mishra et al 2015).…”
Section: Drag Based Model For Propagation Of Cmesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At heliocentric distances beyond R 15, the MHD drag becomes a dominant force (Vršnak et al 2009), so the CME motion is basically influenced solely by the F d term of the force Equation (1).…”
Section: The Drag Forcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…where c d refers to the dimensionless drag coefficient, A is the cross section of the CME, ρ represents the ambient solar wind density, and (v − w) is the velocity difference between the CME and the solar wind (Chen 1989;Chen & Garren 1993;Cargill et al 1996Cargill et al , 2000Cargill & Schmidt 2002;Vršnak & Gopalswamy 2002;Vršnak et al 2004Vršnak et al , 2009Vršnak et al , 2010.…”
Section: The Drag Forcementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation