However, we were well aware of heterogeneity and addressed it by conducting a meta-regression. The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews (9.5.3 Strategies for addressing heterogeneity) qualifies meta-regression explicitly as a valuable technique to explore heterogeneity. 7 Moreover, multiple subgroup analyses, in addition to shedding some light on the variation between study results, would also introduce the problem of chance findings as a result of multiple testing. We remain very aware of the challenges associated with systematic reviews including problems with pre-specifications, the restrictions that go with them, and the risk of spurious findings, issues that we addressed in a recent editorial. 8 Systematic reviewing may not always be an exact science, but synthesising existing evidence is of immense clinical importance, and the systematic review is the tool with which this is done. In the spirit of this importance, we welcome the discussion.