2007
DOI: 10.1002/clc.20157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Aspirin Resistance in the Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndromes

Abstract: SummaryThe thrombosis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) Risk Score recognizes prior aspirin use as an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes in subjects presenting with an acute coronary syndrome. The etiology of this increased risk awaits clarification, but prior aspirin use may be associated with altered thrombus composition which is more resistant to current treatment modalities as compared with thrombus formation in subjects without prior aspirin use. Post hoc analysis of acute coronary syndrome trials… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although previous aspirin users in these 4 trials had more comorbidities than the group not previously using aspirin, these demographic differences were not present within the previous aspirin user group, and so risk factors alone cannot explain the heterogeneous response to antithrombin and antiplatelet therapies compared with UFH; nor can they explain why the differential response does not exist in the group not previously using aspirin (8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Although previous aspirin users in these 4 trials had more comorbidities than the group not previously using aspirin, these demographic differences were not present within the previous aspirin user group, and so risk factors alone cannot explain the heterogeneous response to antithrombin and antiplatelet therapies compared with UFH; nor can they explain why the differential response does not exist in the group not previously using aspirin (8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Although previous aspirin users in these 4 trials had more comorbidities than the group not previously using aspirin, these demographic differences were not present within the previous aspirin user group, and so risk factors alone cannot explain the heterogeneous response to antithrombin and antiplatelet therapies compared with UFH; nor can they explain why the differ-ential response does not exist in the group not previously using aspirin (8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%