2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12944-016-0341-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of background diet on the effects of eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid supplementation in healthy pre-menopausal women: a randomized, cross-over, controlled study

Abstract: BackgroundThe links between dietary fat intake, polyunsaturated fatty acid intake and breast cancer risk remain equivocal, with some studies pointing to improvements in risk upon omega-3 supplementation. However, the background diet is poorly controlled in most studies, potentially confounding this link. Therefore, this study examined the hypothesis that in order to see the benefits of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation, the background diet must be low in fat.MethodsOf the 56 healthy, pre-menopausal women rand… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of the available studies on nutritional supplementation for DED did not evaluate the micronutrients dietary intake nor their plasma level, and this represents the major limitation of the existing literature. Background diet should be considered a confounder in supplementation trials [119], and different dietary practices might explain the heterogeneous results of studies conducted in different world regions. For instance, a recent meta-analysis reported a higher efficacy of omega-3 FAs supplementation in studies conducted in India, where diet is principally vegetarian, with negligible intakes of long-chain omega-3 FAs [63].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of the available studies on nutritional supplementation for DED did not evaluate the micronutrients dietary intake nor their plasma level, and this represents the major limitation of the existing literature. Background diet should be considered a confounder in supplementation trials [119], and different dietary practices might explain the heterogeneous results of studies conducted in different world regions. For instance, a recent meta-analysis reported a higher efficacy of omega-3 FAs supplementation in studies conducted in India, where diet is principally vegetarian, with negligible intakes of long-chain omega-3 FAs [63].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limited conversion from dietary alpha-linolenic acid and the increased consumption of linoleic acid as well as the variation in choice of cooking method imply that protective breast tissue levels of EPA & DHA can be achieved only by direct consumption of these polyunsaturated fatty acids (105,106). It has been evidenced that omega-3 supplementation reaches and imparts significant improvements in the ratio of n-3/n-6 PUFAs at the target breast tissue (107). This justifies a reconsideration of the dietary reference intake for EPA & DHA and provides solid and robust evidence that supports breast cancer prevention by increasing consumption of dietary intake ratios of n-3/n-6 PUFAs.…”
Section: Omega-3 Fatty Acids (Pufas)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identifying the underlying cause of these different NAF colors in healthy women may explain our findings. We hypothesize that several potential factors may contribute to NAF color such as diverse cellular [54] or bacterial [55] compositions in NAF samples, nutrients and proteins [56][57][58], medications [59][60][61][62] or food intake [62][63][64][65][66][67][68]. But studies addressing the association between these possible factors and color classes are limited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%