2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-50334-5_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Behavioral Anthropomorphism in Human-Automation Trust Calibration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The remaining tasks (such as income prediction, number pattern discovery, pothole detection, prescription screening, classification of plants and animals, playing a game, prize prediction) involve fewer risks and might be less suitable for triggering trust. However, some studies increased vulnerabilities by introducing gamification strategies in which participants were (financially) incentivized to perform well [10,55] Interestingly, we noticed that a large domain, medicine/healthcare, commonly characterized as a high-stakes domain, was represented by only two papers. As it is important to learn more about trust in high-stakes domains, this is unfortunate.…”
Section: Security and Safetymentioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The remaining tasks (such as income prediction, number pattern discovery, pothole detection, prescription screening, classification of plants and animals, playing a game, prize prediction) involve fewer risks and might be less suitable for triggering trust. However, some studies increased vulnerabilities by introducing gamification strategies in which participants were (financially) incentivized to perform well [10,55] Interestingly, we noticed that a large domain, medicine/healthcare, commonly characterized as a high-stakes domain, was represented by only two papers. As it is important to learn more about trust in high-stakes domains, this is unfortunate.…”
Section: Security and Safetymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Most studies manipulated the system's capabilities. The most common strategy to achieve this was to vary the levels of system reliability (see, e.g., [4,10,14,15,20,26,27,55,69,81,82,89,94,104,107,117,133,137,139,140,143]).…”
Section: The Trust Calibration Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations