2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.04.065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of bio-mechanical treatments of waste in the dioxin emission inventories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this frame the environmental impact of an incinerator depends on many factors:  Site characteristics (the local climatology strongly affects the local impact);  Amount of residual MSW (RMSW) to be treated (the off-gas flow-rate is proportional to the amount of RMSW burnt, if its characteristics are steady);  Lower Heating Value (LHV) of the RMSW (this parameter influence the off-gas flow-rate);  Emission concentrations at the stack during operating conditions (keeping steady the off-gas flow-rate, the release of pollutants at the stack is proportional to the pollutants concentrations at the emission);  Stack height (a higher stack fosters the pollutants dilution into the atmosphere);  Off-gas velocity at the stack (higher values of this parameter favor the dilution);  Off-gas temperature at the stack (this parameter is limited by the need of performing energy recovery, but it is clear that higher values foster dilution into the atmosphere);  Yearly operating hours (keeping steady the amount of waste to be fed, a shorter working period causes an increase of the waste flow-rate, with consequences on the peaks of impact). In the literature, an analysis of the effects of the operating hours scheduling is not common both for thermochemical processes [4,5] and for biochemical processes [6][7][8][9][10][11]. The aim of this paper is to go beyond the analyses based on overall balances [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this frame the environmental impact of an incinerator depends on many factors:  Site characteristics (the local climatology strongly affects the local impact);  Amount of residual MSW (RMSW) to be treated (the off-gas flow-rate is proportional to the amount of RMSW burnt, if its characteristics are steady);  Lower Heating Value (LHV) of the RMSW (this parameter influence the off-gas flow-rate);  Emission concentrations at the stack during operating conditions (keeping steady the off-gas flow-rate, the release of pollutants at the stack is proportional to the pollutants concentrations at the emission);  Stack height (a higher stack fosters the pollutants dilution into the atmosphere);  Off-gas velocity at the stack (higher values of this parameter favor the dilution);  Off-gas temperature at the stack (this parameter is limited by the need of performing energy recovery, but it is clear that higher values foster dilution into the atmosphere);  Yearly operating hours (keeping steady the amount of waste to be fed, a shorter working period causes an increase of the waste flow-rate, with consequences on the peaks of impact). In the literature, an analysis of the effects of the operating hours scheduling is not common both for thermochemical processes [4,5] and for biochemical processes [6][7][8][9][10][11]. The aim of this paper is to go beyond the analyses based on overall balances [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, in terms of total WHO-TEQ concentrations, the A plant shows the lowest dioxin content with respect to the others. This behavior is due to the fact that the toxicity of the dominant congeners (1,2,3,4,6,7, is lower than the others ( Table 1). Considering that the WHO-TEQ concentrations are related to the toxicity for humans, no anomalies in PCDD/Fs were detected in the food chain for the potentially exposed population.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For some PCDD/F congeners (e.g. 2,3,7,2,3,7,8,, the concentration measured in sewage sludge is lower than the instrumental detection limit (DL) for all the WWTPs considered. Conventionally, concentrations below the DL are assumed as half the DL itself (Table 1 and 2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The environmental impact of the two processes is different: bio-drying is a biological process, thus its emissions are related both to volatilization/extraction of pollutants already existing in the MSW (dioxin (Rada et al [2]), dust, etc.) and to generation of pollutants (ammonia, TOC, etc.…”
Section: Process Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%