Proceedings of Frontiers of Fundamental Physics 14 — PoS(FFP14) 2016
DOI: 10.22323/1.224.0175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of BRST charge as a generator of gauge transformations in quantization of gauge theories and Gravity

Abstract: In the Batalin -Fradkin -Vilkovisky approach to quantization of gauge theories a principal role is given to the BRST charge which can be constructed as a series in Grassmannian (ghost) variables with coefficients given by generalized structure functions of constraints algebra. Alternatively, the BRST charge can be derived making use of the Noether theorem and global BRST invariance of the effective action. In the case of Yang -Mills fields both methods lead to the same expression for the BRST charge, but it is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The both charges coincide in the case of the Yang -Mills fields, as one could expect. But they do not coincide in the case of gravity [28], and here we again encounter the peculiarities of the gravitational theory. The reason why the charge constructed by means of the Noether theorem does not coincide with the BFV charge is that the group of gauge transformations differs from the group of transformations generated by the gravitational constraints, therefore, the BRST transformations in the Lagrangian formalism are not the same as the BRST transformations for field variables in the Hamiltonian formalism.…”
Section: Physical States and The Equivalence Of Different Approaches ...mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The both charges coincide in the case of the Yang -Mills fields, as one could expect. But they do not coincide in the case of gravity [28], and here we again encounter the peculiarities of the gravitational theory. The reason why the charge constructed by means of the Noether theorem does not coincide with the BFV charge is that the group of gauge transformations differs from the group of transformations generated by the gravitational constraints, therefore, the BRST transformations in the Lagrangian formalism are not the same as the BRST transformations for field variables in the Hamiltonian formalism.…”
Section: Physical States and The Equivalence Of Different Approaches ...mentioning
confidence: 66%