2003
DOI: 10.1639/05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Bryophytes in Carbon and Nitrogen Cycling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
390
4
10

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 464 publications
(409 citation statements)
references
References 179 publications
(183 reference statements)
5
390
4
10
Order By: Relevance
“…In hummock tundra the dominant plant species of hummocks are sedges and dwarf shrubs, whereas the interhummock areas are predominantly colonized by mosses (Table 2). Mosses are generally thought to slow down nutrient turnover and decomposition, because of their recalcitrant litter and abundant antimicrobial substances (Aerts et al, 1999;Banerjee and Sen, 1979;Basile et al, 1999;Turetsky, 2003;Malmer et al, 2003). However, we found significantly higher N-mineralization rates in interhummock areas under mosses.…”
Section: Effects Of Plant Functional Typescontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…In hummock tundra the dominant plant species of hummocks are sedges and dwarf shrubs, whereas the interhummock areas are predominantly colonized by mosses (Table 2). Mosses are generally thought to slow down nutrient turnover and decomposition, because of their recalcitrant litter and abundant antimicrobial substances (Aerts et al, 1999;Banerjee and Sen, 1979;Basile et al, 1999;Turetsky, 2003;Malmer et al, 2003). However, we found significantly higher N-mineralization rates in interhummock areas under mosses.…”
Section: Effects Of Plant Functional Typescontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…Bryophytes have less carbon content than vascular plants, because bryophytes synthesize greater concentrations of phenolics and nonpolar compounds in tissues rather than lignin (Turetsky 2003;Eskelinen et al 2009). Moreover, N utilization efficiency of bryophytes is at least partly related to N recycling during senescence, while vascular plants differ from bryophytes in their N assimilation strategy, mainly relying on N mineralized from litter or soils, and absorbed through roots and vascular tissue (Malmer et al 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, bryophytes are very efficient in assimilating N, which are competitive scavengers of N and can reduce N availability of vascular plants, because bryophytes can not only absorb N from soil directly but can also fix atmospheric N 2 by forming facultative symbioses with cyanobionts (DeLuca et al 2002;Turetsky 2003;Ayres et al 2006). In addition, bryophytes absorb more ammonium-N than nitrate-N and glycine-N.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations