2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2008.03.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of carbohydrate reserves in evergreen tree development, with particular reference to macadamia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several reports that suggest that developing litchi fruit are dependent on current photosynthates produced by the new leaves below the inflorescences (Yuan and Huang, 1988;Roe et al, 1997;Hieke et al, 2002b;Bikash et al, 2011). Similar data were also reported in macadamia by Olesen et al (2008). The branches that were pruned would have had fewer leaves per shoot than the branches that were left intact.…”
Section: The Response To Hedging In Bundabergsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…There are several reports that suggest that developing litchi fruit are dependent on current photosynthates produced by the new leaves below the inflorescences (Yuan and Huang, 1988;Roe et al, 1997;Hieke et al, 2002b;Bikash et al, 2011). Similar data were also reported in macadamia by Olesen et al (2008). The branches that were pruned would have had fewer leaves per shoot than the branches that were left intact.…”
Section: The Response To Hedging In Bundabergsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…cx 4 ) fitted to the response of log 10 (total polyphenol concentration) (log 10 [TP]) in mature leaves above 1.5 m to log 10 (proportion of productive canopy volume missing as a result of shoot browsing ?1) for C. apiculatum taller than 2 m at Nkuhlu, 28-30 January 2008 Table 4 Parameters of linear models (y = a ? bx) fitted to (a) the response of log 10 (phosphorus concentration) to log 10 (total proportion of productive canopy volume removed by shoot browsing ?1), and (b) the response of log 10 (total polyphenol concentration) to log 10 (total proportion of productive canopy volume removed by shoot browsing ?1) for G. flavescens at Nkuhlu, 28-30 January 2008 increasing browsing intensity accumulate C from current photosynthate or storage (Medhurst et al 2006;Alcorn et al 2008;Olesen et al 2008). The primary C source in G. flavescens is not likely to be storage because the root system is not large; plants are easily uprooted by elephants, revealing shallow roots.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary C source in G. flavescens is not likely to be storage because the root system is not large; plants are easily uprooted by elephants, revealing shallow roots. As long as sufficient leaves remain after browsing, photosynthesis contributes more than stored C to accumulation of C (Medhurst et al 2006;Olesen et al 2008). Compensatory photosynthesis is expected when sink demand for C is increased, e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Including radiation did little to improve the models, but radiation is still important because canopy photosynthesis decreases once photosynthetic photon flux falls below 500 mmol/m 2 .s (Lloyd et al 1995), and current photosynthate contributes most of the energy required for growth (Sprugel et al 1991;Olesen et al 2008). Temperature and radiation are correlated (r 2 = 0.38; Fig.…”
Section: Flush Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%