2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11936-013-0253-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) and Computed Tomography (CCT) in Facilitating Heart Failure Management

Abstract: Opinion Statement Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and cardiac computed tomography (CCT) offer advantages for detecting left or right ventricular dysfunction in patients with or suspected of heart failure. CMR does not expose patients to ionizing radiation, and thus is well-suited for functional assessments and serial studies. CCT provides high spatial resolution, making it useful for the identification of coronary arteriosclerosis associated with ischemic cardiomyopathy. In this review, the clinical ap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher prevalence of non-cardiac findings in our study as compared with those in Cardiac MRI (CMR) in the study done by Becker CR [45], might be explained by the fact that the reporting of benign non-cardiac findings may have been influenced by a given reader's decision to include (or not include) findings that would not impact the patient's care in MRI. CT has greater spatial resolution [46,47] and is generally considered to be superior to CMR in detecting pulmonary pathology. Unlike TRO, the CMR examination does not capture the entire chest, and CMR sequences are not optimized for non-cardiac pathology [48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher prevalence of non-cardiac findings in our study as compared with those in Cardiac MRI (CMR) in the study done by Becker CR [45], might be explained by the fact that the reporting of benign non-cardiac findings may have been influenced by a given reader's decision to include (or not include) findings that would not impact the patient's care in MRI. CT has greater spatial resolution [46,47] and is generally considered to be superior to CMR in detecting pulmonary pathology. Unlike TRO, the CMR examination does not capture the entire chest, and CMR sequences are not optimized for non-cardiac pathology [48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluation of cardiomyopathy with reduced ejection fraction by CMR is usually performed through a pharmacologic stress test, whereby information on wall motion, rest and stress myocardial perfusion, and delayed gadolinium enhancement are collected 38. Apart from diagnosing ischaemia, CMR stress test results have been demonstrated to provide accurate estimates of cardiovascular prognosis 39.…”
Section: Factsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluation of cardiomyopathy with reduced ejection fraction by CMR is usually performed through a pharmacologic stress test, whereby information on wall motion, rest and stress myocardial perfusion, and delayed gadolinium enhancement are collected. 38 Apart from diagnosing ischaemia, CMR stress Guest Editorial test results have been demonstrated to provide accurate estimates of cardiovascular prognosis. 39 For example, Steel et al showed the prognostic implication and usefulness of stress CMR myocardial perfusion and late gadolinium enhancement in a population of 254 patients, whereby patients with neither perfusion deficits nor late gadolinium enhancement had a 98.1% negative annual event rate for death and myocardial infarction.…”
Section: Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different types of technology have been developed for the non-invasive examination of CVDs, such as computed tomography (CT), cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), echocardiography, etc., [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%