2000
DOI: 10.1016/s1388-9842(00)00096-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in heart failure

Abstract: Ž. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance CMR , is an accepted gold standard for non-invasive, accurate, and reproducible assessment of cardiac mass and function. The interest in its use for viability, myocardial perfusion and coronary artery imaging is also widespread and growing rapidly as the hardware and expertise becomes available in more centres, and the scans themselves become more cost effective. In patients with heart failure, accurate and reproducible serial assessment of remodelling is of prognostic impo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22 To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first comparison of the effects of single-pill antihypertensive combination therapies on LVH regression. Using highly reproducible CMR methodology, 23 we found significant reduction of LVMI by both A/B and HCTZ/B treatments, with a mean difference between treatment arms of 3.5 g/m 2 (4.5%) that fell short of the hypothesized difference of 8.0 g/m 2 and was not statistically significant. Previous studies have compared antihypertensive monotherapies to each other, to placebo, or to no treatment, mostly using echocardiography.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…22 To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first comparison of the effects of single-pill antihypertensive combination therapies on LVH regression. Using highly reproducible CMR methodology, 23 we found significant reduction of LVMI by both A/B and HCTZ/B treatments, with a mean difference between treatment arms of 3.5 g/m 2 (4.5%) that fell short of the hypothesized difference of 8.0 g/m 2 and was not statistically significant. Previous studies have compared antihypertensive monotherapies to each other, to placebo, or to no treatment, mostly using echocardiography.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…We have assessed cardiac function using MRI and tagging. [5][6][7] MRI provides a "1-shop" method for assessing not only cardiac morphology and function but also epicardial and visceral fat mass during the same session. MRI tagging, which directly measures intramural circumferential myocardial shortening, is a highly accurate method for direct quantification of regional systolic function, allowing one to reveal small, otherwise undetectable functional abnormalities of the myocardium.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical decisions (i.e., medical vs. interventional therapy) frequently rely on being able to differentiate reversible from irreversible or acute from chronic myocardial injury and knowing the extent of myocardial injury (14), so that unnecessary invasive procedures may be prevented. Currently, myocardial injury characterization by MRI is most commonly performed using T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced imaging (15), where substantial differences be- It also requires extended imaging times and is restricted in its accuracy for precise quantification of myocardial scar tissue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%