The role of case and animacy in bi-and monolingual children’s sentence interpretation in German: a developmental perspective

Gamper, Jana

doi:10.1515/opli-2019-0001

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 48 publications

(92 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To exclude confounding factors, we controlled for animacy and included only [+animate] direct and indirect objects (see Gamper, 2019 , for case-animacy coalitions), all of which were animals to exclude influence of animacy hierarchy. To avoid the participants' use of semantic cues for the assignment of thematic roles, all items used were semantically reversible.…”

Section: Study 1 – Productionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Bilingual Native Speaker Competence: Evidence From Explicit and Implicit Language Knowledge Using Elicited Production, Sentence-Picture Matching, and Pupillometry

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present pilot study investigated potential effects of early and late child bilingualism in highly proficient adult bilinguals. It has been shown that some early second language (eL2) speakers stagnate when it comes to complex linguistic phenomena and that they display subtle difficulties in adulthood. Therefore, we have chosen the complex structure of double object constructions. We investigate the long-term achievement in a combined-method approach using elicited production, explicit comprehension by sentence-picture matching and a measure of implicit linguistic knowledge, namely pupillometry. This eye tracking method is suitable for measuring implicit reactions of the pupils to unexpected or ungrammatical stimuli. For production, ditransitive structures were elicited by means of a game. For comprehension, a sentence-picture matching task was conducted. Two pictures were shown on a monitor that were equal with respect to the involved objects, but the thematic roles of direct and indirect objects were interchanged. Items were controlled for length, gender, animacy, semantic likelihood and word order. Reaction times and accuracy scores were analyzed. To this end, N = 18 bilingual adult speakers of German (+ another language, mean age: 26.5) with different ages of onset participated in this study and were compared to N = 26 monolingual German adult speakers (mean age 23.9). All participants had a proficiency of German above 89% correct in placement and cloze tests. Results show fully comparable productive and comprehensive competencies in monolinguals and bilinguals including the reaction times in the sentence-picture matching task and a word order effect on the reaction times in both groups. In the pupillometry task, we found monolinguals and bilinguals to be sensitive to differing conditions with respect to grammatical and ungrammatical utterances. However, we find between group differences in pupil dilations in that bilinguals react differently to strong grammatical violations than monolinguals. These results are discussed with respect to the term of native speaker competence and the variation within both groups.

show abstract

Section: Study 1 – Productionmentioning

confidence: 99%