EAAT glutamate transporters do not only function as secondary-active glutamate transporters but also as anion channels. EAAT anion channel activity depends on transport substrates. For most isoforms, it is negligible without external Na ؉ and increased by external glutamate. We here investigated gating of EAAT4 anion channels with various cations and amino acid substrates using patch clamp experiments on a mammalian cell line. Excitatory amino acid transporters (EAATs) 2 comprise a family of glial and neuronal glutamate transporters that are crucial for termination of glutamatergic synaptic transmission and for maintenance of low resting glutamate levels (1-3). EAATmediated glutamate transport is stoichiometrically coupled to the movement of three sodium ions and one proton, while one potassium ion is counter-transported (4, 5). EAATs remove glutamate from the synaptic cleft and its surrounding as stoichiometrically coupled co-transporters of one glutamate, three sodium ions, and one proton, whereas one potassium ion is counter-transported (4, 5). However, EAATs are not only secondary-active glutamate transporters but also anion-selective channels (6). For some EAAT isoforms, anion currents are much smaller than the electrogenic uptake currents. For others, anion currents represent the predominant transporter-mediated current component (7-10). These differences suggest that some EAATs might play a physiological role as substrate-gated anion channels involved in the regulation of cellular excitability and others as glutamate transporters (11,12).EAAT anion channels have been functionally characterized in detail (7,8,10,(12)(13)(14)(15)(16). Many experimental results support a model in which only certain carrier conformations are associated with conducting anion pores, and the anion channel cycles between conducting and non-conducting states during transitions through various conformational states of the glutamate transporter (14,17). This tight coupling predicts that the voltage dependence of EAAT anion currents exclusively arises from transitions between different carrier conformations and that kinetic properties of EAAT transporters might be extracted from EAAT anion currents. Indeed, all current kinetic models are based on such measurements (14,18,19). However, defining kinetic parameters from anion currents is only possible if all channel states are directly associated with the uptake cycle. This has been questioned by recent reports: for EAAT1 and EAAT3, Li ϩ was reported to support coupled transport, but not anion channel function, indicating an additional Na ϩ -dependent conformational gating transition of EAAT anion channels beyond the uptake cycle (20,21).To further probe the existence of such conformational changes, we studied the substrate dependence of EAAT4 anion channels by comparing channel gating in Na ϩ and Li ϩ as well as in glutamate, aspartate, and cysteine. We observed distinct anion channel gating for the three amino acid substrates. Our data can be described by a kinetic scheme in which the...