1991
DOI: 10.1080/00335639109383941
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of character in public moral argument: Henry ward Beecher and the Brooklyn scandal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most Englanders did not debate the question of whether the world needed their empire-they were simply quibbling about the nature, scope, and limits of their interventionist practices. These imperial debates created a vast reservoir of what Carlson (1991) calls public moral arguments, those issues of character that may be just as important as the formalistic logics or pieces of evidence that are persuasive elements of legal cases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most Englanders did not debate the question of whether the world needed their empire-they were simply quibbling about the nature, scope, and limits of their interventionist practices. These imperial debates created a vast reservoir of what Carlson (1991) calls public moral arguments, those issues of character that may be just as important as the formalistic logics or pieces of evidence that are persuasive elements of legal cases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%