1965
DOI: 10.1172/jci105146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Chloride in Hypokalemic Alkalosis in the Rat*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

1967
1967
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 In addition there is an experimental study which does not prove intracellular acidosis in hypokalemic alkalosis7 These reports appear to be compatible with the results of our present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…6 In addition there is an experimental study which does not prove intracellular acidosis in hypokalemic alkalosis7 These reports appear to be compatible with the results of our present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…7). Selective repletion with K or Cl only partially repaired the alkalosis and GFR, while KCl repaired both, as has been previously described (13,30,33,42). The rat is more "chloride-resistant" than dog or man with respect to repair of alkalosis with NaCl (13,29,30).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…That isolated dietary K depletion, as in groups IVB and IVc, can sustain metabolic alkalosis has long been known for the rat (5,29,30) and for man (31,32), though not for the dog. Mineralocorticoid treatment (e.g., DOCA), as in group IIIA, is also a well established cause of persisting metabolic alkalosis associated with K deficiency (13,29,33), simulating primary hyperaldosteronism.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During the experimental induction of potassium depletion in rats these coexistent factors are often present [9], but the typical vacuoles of proximal tubules described in clinical cases are never seen. This discrepancy in morpho logical findings may be attributed to a species difference.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%