The role of collective efficacy in long‐term condition management: A metasynthesis

Abstract

Social networks have been found to have a valuable role in supporting the management of long‐term conditions. However, the focus on the quality and how well self‐management interventions work focus on individualised behavioural outcomes such as self‐efficacy and there is a need for understanding that focuses on the role of wider collective processes in self‐management support. Collective efficacy presents a potentially useful candidate concept in the development and understanding of self‐management support interventions. To date it has mainly been utilised in the context of organisations and neighbourhoods related to social phenomena such as community cohesion. Drawing on Bandura's original theorisation this meta‐synthesis explores how studies of collective efficacy might illuminate collective elements operating within the personal communities of people with long‐term conditions. A qualitative meta‐synthesis was undertaken. Studies published between 1998 and 2018 that examined collective efficacy in relation to health and well‐being using qualitative and mixed methods was eligible for inclusion. Timing of engagement with others, building trust in the group, and legitimising ongoing engagement with the group arised as central elements of collective efficacy. The two themes forming third order constructs were related to the presence of continuous interaction and ongoing relational work between members of the group. Collective efficacy can develop and be sustained over time in a range of situations where individuals may not have intense relationships with one another and have limited commitment and contact with one another. Extending this to the personal communities of people with long‐term conditions it may be the case that collective efficacy enables a number of engagement opportunities which can be oriented towards assisting with support from networks over a sustained length of time. This may include negotiating acceptable connections to resources and activities which in turn may help change existing practice in ways that improve long‐term condition management.

Investigating the relationships between social capital, chronic health conditions and health status among Australian adults: findings from an Australian national cohort survey

“…Based on our findings, it may be crucial to posit a community empowerment approach through integrating health and social services, promoting community partnerships and engagement [61]. Health consequences of stressors depend upon different types and amount of resources available in a community, such as coping, supports and trust [62,63]. Numerous studies have explored the buffering role of social support as community resources in attenuating negative consequences of external stressors; however less is known about the role and the function of social capital in the stress-buffering process [64].…”

Community-Level Sports Group Participation and Health Behaviors Among Older Non-Participants in a Sports Group: A Multilevel Cross-Sectional Study

“…Another possible pathway is collective efficacy, which is the group-level analog of the concept of self-efficacy and refers to the ability of the collective to mobilize to undertake a collective action [ 12 , 26 , 27 ]. Facilities, built environment, industries, systems, and bylaws for health promotion may develop to reflect the opinions and actions of communities with numerous sports groups and their participants.…”

Rural influences on the social network dynamics of district nursing services: A qualitative meta‐synthesis

“…This may be because in such circumstances nurses are more likely to be familiar to patients, their family members and the wider local community either directly or indirectly through personal and professional reputation and support. These weak ties with patients paired with an understanding of local and individual structures of support, can allow nurses to help patients find, access, and mobilize other network members in a way that is acceptable to them 45 , 46 but also make them aware of new relationships and support that might be available, thus increasing the diversity of support and information. 11 , 16 Such relations with patients are likely to be sustainable over the longer term as, they are contextually sensitive, but also compared to strong ties, require lower levels of relational work (eg, in negotiating acceptable engagement with other network members) and thus reduce the risk of burnout of nurses.…”