The role of color information on object recognition: A review and meta-analysis

Bramão, Inês; Reis, Alexandra; Petersson, Karl Magnus; Faísca, Luis

doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.06.010

Cited by 146 publications

(130 citation statements)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

117

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Although it is generally accepted that color photographs are more ecologically valid (e.g., Moreno-Martínez, Montoro, & Laws, 2011), a position supported by a recent meta-analysis of 35 studies with 1535 participants which showed that color information has a moderate effect size on object recognition in naming tasks (d = .36;Bramão, Reis, Petersson, & Faísca, 2011); few researchers have systematically compared performance on color photographic stimuli with black and white line-drawn stimuli (Bramão et al, 2011). In one such study Adlington, Laws, and Gale (2009a) compared the performance of 41 AD patients with 40 elderly controls on color, grey scale, and line-drawn items.…”

Section: Review Of Other Measures Of Visual Confrontation Namingmentioning

confidence: 94%

Is the Boston Naming Test Still Fit For Purpose?

Harry

Crowe

2014

The Clinical Neuropsychologist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Boston Naming Test (BNT) (Kaplan, Goodglass, & Weintraub, 1983) is the most commonly used test of confrontation naming in neuropsychology (Rabin, Barr, & Burton, 2005). However, there are significant criticisms of the BNT which suggest that it might not be the assessment measure of choice. These criticisms are that the BNT has poor psychometric properties, is not adequately standardized, and has inadequate norms. It is further suggested that when considered in the context of contemporary conceptualizations of the neuropsychology of naming, the BNT does not adequately capture the processes known to be required for successful naming, and does not sample widely enough from the content domain of "naming". These criticisms suggest that the BNT is flawed as a measure of naming, and are discussed in detail in this review. Other stand-alone visual confrontation naming tasks are reviewed to evaluate whether any might be viable substitutes for the BNT in clinical neuropsychology. The Naming Test from the Neuropsychological Assessment Battery (Stern & White, 2009) was identified as a possible alternative to the BNT, however, neither of these tests was designed with reference to models of the neuropsychology of naming, and development of a new test of naming is indicated.

show abstract

Section: Review Of Other Measures Of Visual Confrontation Namingmentioning

confidence: 94%

Is the Boston Naming Test Still Fit For Purpose?

Harry

Crowe

2014

The Clinical Neuropsychologist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Yet, an additional sensitivity analysis was computed including only one randomly selected effect size per sample, in order to evaluate how ignoring the dependency between the effect sizes influenced the results. A similar methodological approach to handle this issue was already used in previous meta-analyses (e.g., Bramão, Reis, Petersson, & Faísca, 2011).…”

Section: Meta-analytic Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Rapid automatized naming and reading performance: A meta-analysis.

Araújo¹,

Reis²,

Petersson³

et al. 2015

Journal of Educational Psychology

Self Cite

234

216

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Evidence that rapid naming skill is associated with reading ability has become increasingly prevalent in recent years. However, there is considerable variation in the literature concerning the magnitude of this relationship. The objective of the present study was to provide a comprehensive analysis of the evidence on the relationship between rapid automatized naming (RAN) and reading performance. To this end, we conducted a meta-analysis of the correlational relationship between these 2 constructs to (a) determine the overall strength of the RAN-reading association and (b) identify variables that systematically moderate this relationship. A random-effects model analysis of data from 137 studies (857 effect sizes; 28,826 participants) indicated a moderate-to-strong relationship between RAN and reading performance (r ϭ .43, I 2 ϭ 68.40). Further analyses revealed that RAN contributes to the 4 measures of reading (word reading, text reading, non-word reading, and reading comprehension), but higher coefficients emerged in favor of real word reading and text reading. RAN stimulus type and type of reading score were the factors with the greatest moderator effect on the magnitude of the RAN-reading relationship. The consistency of orthography and the subjects' grade level were also found to impact this relationship, although the effect was contingent on reading outcome. It was less evident whether the subjects' reading proficiency played a role in the relationship. Implications for future studies are discussed.

show abstract

“…U Tanakinim istraživanjima od ukupno 24 stimulusa, 11 stimulusa je spadalo u kategoriju prirodnih objekta, a od 12 HCD stimulusa 8 je spadalo u kategoriju hrane i svi su bili prirodni objekti (Tanaka & Presnel, 1999;Tanaka, Weiskopf, & Williams, 2001). U meta studiji koja poredi nalaze 35 istraživanja nađen je umeren efekat boje na prepoznavanje objekata (Bramão, Reis, Petersson, & Faísca, 2011), ali najvažniji faktor koji se navodi upravo jeste dijagnostičnost boje. Dodatno, autori nalaze jasan doprinos boje u zadacima imenovanja (engl.…”

unclassified

“…Pri izboru metode vodili smo nalazima da je u zadataku prepoznavanja objekata naročito kontradiktoran doprinos boje (Bramão, Reis, Petersson, & Faísca, 2011). Stoga su u našim zadacima ispitanici dobijali naziv ili kategoriju objekta pre njegove slike, što nam je omogućilo da ispitamo još jedan aspekt doprinosa boje znanju o objektu.…”

unclassified

Uloga Oblika I Boje U Prepoznavanju I Klasifikaciji Poznatih Vizuelnih Objekata

Ludajić

Zdravković

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Čulom vida dobija se veliki broj informacija na osnovu kojih je moguće prepoznati objekte (npr. boja, oblik, tekstura, 3D struktura, pokret, pravac kretanja). Količina informacija nije samo velika već se i tiče različitih aspekata objekata, te je nakon prepoznavanja neophodna i klasifikacija, tj. grupisanje i integrisanje ulaznih informacija (Marr, 1982). Zbog svega ovoga prepoznavanje i klasifikacija spadaju u osnovne kognitivne procese koji omogućavaju saznavanje sveta oko nas, a istraživanju načina na koji naš sistem realizuje pomenute kognitivne procese posvećen je veliki broja studija

show abstract

The role of color information on object recognition: A review and meta-analysis

Cited by 146 publications

References 44 publications

Is the Boston Naming Test Still Fit For Purpose?

Is the Boston Naming Test Still Fit For Purpose?

Rapid automatized naming and reading performance: A meta-analysis.

Uloga Oblika I Boje U Prepoznavanju I Klasifikaciji Poznatih Vizuelnih Objekata

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About