2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of common knowledge in achieving collaboration across practices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
98
0
11

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
98
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…My own work on relational expertise and relational agency (Edwards, 2010(Edwards, , 2012 plays to this suggestion and has implications for ITE and teachers' continuing professional development. Both concepts point to how professional agency, the capacity to make strong evaluations, interpret complex problems and bring to bear the best resources available to work on them is accomplished through working relationally.…”
Section: Implications For the Teaching Professionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…My own work on relational expertise and relational agency (Edwards, 2010(Edwards, , 2012 plays to this suggestion and has implications for ITE and teachers' continuing professional development. Both concepts point to how professional agency, the capacity to make strong evaluations, interpret complex problems and bring to bear the best resources available to work on them is accomplished through working relationally.…”
Section: Implications For the Teaching Professionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unknown to us at the time was the deep need for shared expertise that generated a common knowledge of the intervention goals, processes and potential outcomes. Shared expertise combines the unique expertise of researchers and teachers to bridge practice boundaries for rich knowledge exchange that yields common knowledge (Edwards, 2012). It involves the ability for stakeholders to recognize the standpoint of others and to be explicit and comprehensible when discussing their own interpretations and ways of responding to the problem they are working to solve.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This congruence of PRA and CHAT has meant that we have been able to draw on the three conceptual tools within the CHAT tradition, which are at the core of this collection: common knowledge, relational expertise, and relational agency (See Chapter 1 and Edwards, 2010Edwards, , 2012. These tools have allowed us, as a research team, to interrogate and analyse the responsive pedagogies within and across the three pilot sites.…”
Section: Understandings Of Action Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%