2017
DOI: 10.4274/jus.1363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Computed Tomography Findings in Prediction of Stone Composition

Abstract: We evaluated two 18-year-old patients who presented to our clinic with flank pain. The patients underwent metabolic evaluation and non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT). In 24-hour urine analysis, patient-1 had high oxalate and low citrate levels, while patient-2 had a high homocysteine level. NCCT images revealed a renal stone in the right kidney in both patients. Stone diameters and Hounsfield units (HU) were measured with large magnification in bone window on NCCT images (Figure 1). The difference in HU (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After serial measurements of the highest HU value (HUmax) and the lowest HU value (HUmin), HU value was calculated as the average of these two values (HUave). The difference in HU (HUdiff) was calculated as the difference between the HUmax and the HUmin values, as previously defined by Celik et al (14,15) Hounsfield density (HD) was calculated as HUmax divided by stone size (16). All URSL treatments were performed with a 8/9.8 F rigid ureteroscope (Karl Storz®, Tuttlingen, Germany), 365 µm PercuFib or 550 µm RigiFib laser probes (LISA® laser products OHG, Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany) and a 80 watt Ho:YAG laser device (Sphinx®, Livermore, CA, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After serial measurements of the highest HU value (HUmax) and the lowest HU value (HUmin), HU value was calculated as the average of these two values (HUave). The difference in HU (HUdiff) was calculated as the difference between the HUmax and the HUmin values, as previously defined by Celik et al (14,15) Hounsfield density (HD) was calculated as HUmax divided by stone size (16). All URSL treatments were performed with a 8/9.8 F rigid ureteroscope (Karl Storz®, Tuttlingen, Germany), 365 µm PercuFib or 550 µm RigiFib laser probes (LISA® laser products OHG, Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany) and a 80 watt Ho:YAG laser device (Sphinx®, Livermore, CA, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%