1995
DOI: 10.2307/748031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Context and Dictionary Definitions on Varying Levels of Word Knowledge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
41
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A strong treatment would explain more variance than a weak treatment but the quantification of the strength of a treatment is generally unknown. For example Nist and Olejnik (1995) studied the effect of context and dictionary use on varying levels of word knowledge. In this study the quality of the dictionary definitions and the quality of the context in which the target words were provided were varied.…”
Section: Cautionary Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A strong treatment would explain more variance than a weak treatment but the quantification of the strength of a treatment is generally unknown. For example Nist and Olejnik (1995) studied the effect of context and dictionary use on varying levels of word knowledge. In this study the quality of the dictionary definitions and the quality of the context in which the target words were provided were varied.…”
Section: Cautionary Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On one hand, a number of scholars have pointed out the critical importance of context or contextual knowledge in vocabulary acquisition (Beheydt, 1987;Miller, 1999;Pavlenko, 2009;Sternberg, 1987); while on the other, empirical studies conducted to verify the effects of context have resulted in mixed findings, providing only partial support to the above claim (Dempster, 1987;Gipe & Arnold, 1979;Laufer & Shmueli, 1997;Lawson & Hogben, 1996;Nist & Olejnik, 1995;see Nation, 2001 for review). Some of these findings indicate a superiority of translation learning over context learning (Dempster, 1987;Laufer & Shmueli, 1997;Lawson & Hogben, 1996) while others reveal the positive effect of enhanced context (Nist & Olejnik, 1995).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, how qualitatively different such context is compared to the original text (one of the four modes) 'It was a stereotype seized upon avidly by the film industry' in clarifying the meaning and use of the target word 'avidly', is questionable. A similar concern has been expressed by Nist and Olejnik (1995) regarding the fuzziness of how 'strong' (a notion equivalent to 'elaborated' in Laufer and Shmueli's study) context needs to be to result in adequate mastering of the meaning of a word. Without first establishing a basis to effectively control the independent variable, i.e.…”
Section: International Journal Of Research Studies In Language Learningmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The studies have been done on how much learners are successful in inferring meaning from context (Nist & Olejnik, 1995;Schatz & Baldwin, 1986), on the role of proficiency levels (Fraser, 1999;Bengeleil & Paribakht, 2004), on the role of the clues utilized (Paribakht & Wesche 2006;Wesche & Paribakht, 2010), or on the processes of lexical inferencing (Fukkink, 2005). However, to the best of the researchers' knowledge, no study has been conducted to investigate the role of the repetition of the words in the context on the lexical inferencing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%