2021
DOI: 10.1108/ramj-05-2021-0035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of digital skill in mitigating digital divide: evidences from Asia-Pacific region

Abstract: PurposeThis paper aims to make a modest attempt to classify the Asia-Pacific countries in terms of the access to information and communication technology (ICT) to unearth the prevalence of digital divide (if any) in the Asia-Pacific region. In addition to that, this paper also examines the role played by the digital skill in bridging the digital divide in the context of Asia–Pacific countries.Design/methodology/approachSecondary data on 43 Asia-Pacific countries for the period from 2012 to 2017 was collected f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Special consideration was given to the digital divide as the interface spacing timetable in the benefit and value of the usefulness of accounting information (Sin et al, 2021). Maji and Laha (2022) argue that the digital divide exists in most states between those who have access to information and communication technology (ICT) tools and those who do not have the skills to access them. Pajunen et al (2020) argue about the possibility of reducing the digital divide of the information resulting from the financial reports prepared following the requirements of the consolidated accounting system through the existence of inadequate disclosure.…”
Section: The Concept Of the Digital Dividementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Special consideration was given to the digital divide as the interface spacing timetable in the benefit and value of the usefulness of accounting information (Sin et al, 2021). Maji and Laha (2022) argue that the digital divide exists in most states between those who have access to information and communication technology (ICT) tools and those who do not have the skills to access them. Pajunen et al (2020) argue about the possibility of reducing the digital divide of the information resulting from the financial reports prepared following the requirements of the consolidated accounting system through the existence of inadequate disclosure.…”
Section: The Concept Of the Digital Dividementioning
confidence: 99%
“…DiMaggio, Hargittai, Neuman and Robinson (2001) highlight the potential of internet access disparity to restrict opportunities in education, government information access, political participation and social networks, favoring its use as a digitalization measure. However, internet access can be measured in several ways, including individual internet usage (Maji & Laha, 2022;Myovella et al, 2021), fixed broadband subscriptions (Maji & Laha, 2022;Myovella et al, 2021), digital economy and society indices (Boikova, Zeverte-Rivza, Rivza, & Rivza, 2021) and network readiness indices (Tudose, Georgescu, & Avasilc ai, 2023). While acknowledging the limitations of accessing the latter two indices, this study primarily uses the percentage of internet users as a main dependent variable for digitalization.…”
Section: Literature Review 21 Brief Overview Of Digitalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, 40.4% of urban households in Sri Lanka are considered computer literate, whereas in rural areas the proportion is only 27.5% (Quimba et al, 2020). Levels of education, household income, and the degree of urbanization appear to be important factors behind the digital divide in Asia (Maji & Laha, 2020, 2022).…”
Section: The Digital Divide and Povertymentioning
confidence: 99%