2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18926.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of dissipation in the scaling relations of cosmological merger remnants

Abstract: There are strong correlations between the three structural properties of elliptical galaxies – stellar mass, velocity dispersion and size – in the form of a tight ‘Fundamental Plane’ and a ‘scaling relation’ between each pair. Major mergers of disc galaxies are assumed to be a mechanism for producing ellipticals, but semi‐analytic galaxy formation models (SAMs) have encountered apparent difficulties in reproducing the observed slope and scatter of the size–mass relation. We study the scaling relations of merge… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
58
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
4
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of 1:5 minor mergers with a less compact satellite (red solid line), we obtain a mass-size growth relation of re ∝M 2.4 with a similar or even larger exponent for both two-component 1:10 scenarios. Therefore we consider all minor merger models (1:5 and 1:10) with dark matter halos and the diffuse 1:10 mergers to be consistent with observations even in more realistic models, where dissipational effects would reduce the size growth Cox et al 2006;Hopkins et al 2008;Covington et al 2011). The size growth via major mergers is too slow to fit observational data.…”
Section: Evolution Of the Sizesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In the case of 1:5 minor mergers with a less compact satellite (red solid line), we obtain a mass-size growth relation of re ∝M 2.4 with a similar or even larger exponent for both two-component 1:10 scenarios. Therefore we consider all minor merger models (1:5 and 1:10) with dark matter halos and the diffuse 1:10 mergers to be consistent with observations even in more realistic models, where dissipational effects would reduce the size growth Cox et al 2006;Hopkins et al 2008;Covington et al 2011). The size growth via major mergers is too slow to fit observational data.…”
Section: Evolution Of the Sizesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Simulations predict that both gas-rich major mergers (Hopkins et al 2009a;Wuyts et al 2010) and disk instabilities (Dekel et al 2009b;Ceverino et al 2010) can form cSFGs by stochastically transforming only a fraction of the larger population of normal SFGs. This process effectively shifts those (larger) galaxies into a steeper mass-size relation (Covington et al 2008(Covington et al , 2011. Alternatively, very early phases of star formation could be dominated by strongly dissipational, but efficiently cold flow fed (Kereš et al 2005;Dekel et al 2009a;Oser et al 2010), processes.…”
Section: Number Density Of Compact Galaxiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the major merger case, the merger remnant is a merger-driven bulge, containing all the stellar mass of the two progenitors, plus the newly formed stars when the cold gas mass available in the collision is bursted (see Lu et al 2014, Croton et al 2016). We develop a recipe for the structure of the remnant (or remmant bulge) in analogy with Hatton et al (2003) and Covington et al (2011), which we represent in Fig. (1) as the orbital R radius.…”
Section: Mergers On Spheroids and Major Mergersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A problem of theoretical models based on hierarchical clustering has been to produce galaxies with no evidence of merger-built components (Steinmetz & Navarro 2002, Kormendy & Kennicutt 2004, and to produce a realistic distribution of galaxy morphologies (Wilman et al 2013, Fontanot et al 2015. In addition, models do not in general predict the size of bulges and ellipticals (with the exception of Hatton et al 2003 andCovington et al 2011 who use a physical recipe to calculate the size of merger remnants). Correctly producing the size of galaxies is an important test for galaxy formation models, and historically one met with scarse success.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%