2015
DOI: 10.1108/jd-12-2013-0169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of documents in the U.S.

Abstract: Purpose -How documents pour l'action organize and bind US society. The paper aims to discuss this issue. Design/methodology/approach -Manuel Zacklad's concept of documents pour l'action are examined as highly embedded social objects using cultural anthropology and the robotics concept of stigmergy. Pragmatic literacy as opposed to scholarly or recreational literacy is used to inform the discussion. Findings -Documents pour l'action are more than memory devices that explain or describe. They function within hig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is growing recognition of the importance of understanding documents as part of policy regimes (Choksy, 2015), emphasizing policy analysis of the relationships of public libraries to national and state government policies (Jaeger et al , 2014) as well as the relationship of public library policies to their own local constituencies (Vårheim et al , 2019). As noted above, policies are often intended to address perceived or potential problems, but may have numerous effects and side-effects, both intentional and coincidental.…”
Section: Politics Policies and Public Librariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is growing recognition of the importance of understanding documents as part of policy regimes (Choksy, 2015), emphasizing policy analysis of the relationships of public libraries to national and state government policies (Jaeger et al , 2014) as well as the relationship of public library policies to their own local constituencies (Vårheim et al , 2019). As noted above, policies are often intended to address perceived or potential problems, but may have numerous effects and side-effects, both intentional and coincidental.…”
Section: Politics Policies and Public Librariesmentioning
confidence: 99%